From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
To: Ahmad Gani <reyuki@gnuweeb.org>
Cc: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org>,
GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH gwproxy v4 0/6] Initial work for DNS lookup implementation
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 03:50:33 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJPAGdI5BITFBjXl@linux.gnuweeb.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJMklZvcF21wyhLG@linux.gnuweeb.org>
On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 04:47:05PM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> Yeah, it's missing -Werror flag on the CI, so it didn't fail. That warning
> actually exists:
>
> x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -ggdb3 -fvisibility=hidden -fno-strict-aliasing -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-stack-protector -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations -Wstrict-aliasing=3 -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstack-usage=8192 -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wformat-signedness -Wunreachable-code -Wsequence-point -Wextra -Wall -O2 -fpic -fPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -include /home/runner/work/gwproxy/gwproxy/config.h -I./src/ -DNDEBUG -MMD -MP -MF src/gwproxy/ev/epoll.c.o.d -c src/gwproxy/ev/epoll.c -o src/gwproxy/ev/epoll.c.o
> src/gwproxy/net.c:1: warning: "_GNU_SOURCE" redefined
> 1 | #define _GNU_SOURCE
> |
> <command-line>: note: this is the location of the previous definition
I was a bit busy deep cleaning my house and had several video calls.
Now I am back to this CI thing, it turned out that when enabling
io_uring support, it breaks 32-bit architectures. This one is from
i686:
```
src/gwproxy/ev/io_uring.c: In function ‘prep_timer_del_target’:
src/gwproxy/ev/io_uring.c:327:56: error: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Werror=pointer-to-int-cast]
327 | io_uring_prep_timeout_remove(s, EV_BIT_TIMER | (uint64_t)gcp, 0);
| ^
src/gwproxy/ev/io_uring.c: In function ‘handle_event’:
src/gwproxy/ev/io_uring.c:773:23: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Werror=int-to-pointer-cast]
773 | void *udata = (void *)CLEAR_EV_BIT(cqe->user_data);
| ^
In file included from ./src/gwproxy/gwproxy.h:15,
from ./src/gwproxy/ev/io_uring.h:8,
from src/gwproxy/ev/io_uring.c:11:
src/gwproxy/ev/io_uring.c:857:26: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type ‘int’ [-Werror=format=]
857 | pr_err(&ctx->lh, "Bug, invalid %s: res=%d, fd=%ld, s=%s", inv_op,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
858 | cqe->res, (intptr_t)udata, strerror(-cqe->res));
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| int
./src/gwproxy/log.h:40:41: note: in definition of macro ‘pr_log’
40 | __pr_log(__hd->handle, __level, FMT, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~
src/gwproxy/ev/io_uring.c:857:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘pr_err’
857 | pr_err(&ctx->lh, "Bug, invalid %s: res=%d, fd=%ld, s=%s", inv_op,
| ^~~~~~
src/gwproxy/ev/io_uring.c:857:57: note: format string is defined here
857 | pr_err(&ctx->lh, "Bug, invalid %s: res=%d, fd=%ld, s=%s", inv_op,
| ~~^
| |
| long int
| %d
```
Apparently this happens because a pointer size on 32-bit architectures
is 32-bit. We need double-casts to fix mess. I'll fix it.
--
Ammar Faizi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-06 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-06 3:57 [PATCH gwproxy v4 0/6] Initial work for DNS lookup implementation Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 3:57 ` [PATCH gwproxy v4 1/6] dnslookup: Split common functionality and struct into net.h and net.c Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 6:18 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2025-08-06 3:57 ` [PATCH gwproxy v4 2/6] dnslookup: Add a new parameter default_port Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 6:20 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2025-08-06 3:57 ` [PATCH gwproxy v4 3/6] dnslookup: Allow only port string number Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 3:57 ` [PATCH gwproxy v4 4/6] dnslookup: Initial work for implementation of C-ares-like getaddrinfo function Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 6:40 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2025-08-06 6:51 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2025-08-06 8:43 ` Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 8:40 ` Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 11:09 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2025-08-06 11:20 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2025-08-06 11:39 ` Ammar Faizi
2025-08-06 12:30 ` Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 20:54 ` Ammar Faizi
2025-08-06 12:30 ` Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 21:33 ` Ammar Faizi
2025-08-14 4:54 ` Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 3:57 ` [PATCH gwproxy v4 5/6] dnsparser: Transaction id creation is delegated to caller Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 6:28 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2025-08-06 10:20 ` Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 10:51 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2025-08-06 12:29 ` Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 3:57 ` [PATCH gwproxy v4 6/6] dnslookup: Make gw_ares_getaddrinfo asynchronous Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 6:22 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2025-08-06 8:42 ` Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 7:03 ` [PATCH gwproxy v4 0/6] Initial work for DNS lookup implementation Ammar Faizi
2025-08-06 7:08 ` Ammar Faizi
2025-08-06 8:37 ` Ahmad Gani
2025-08-06 8:58 ` Ammar Faizi
2025-08-06 9:47 ` Ammar Faizi
2025-08-06 20:50 ` Ammar Faizi [this message]
2025-08-06 22:14 ` Ammar Faizi
2025-08-06 7:08 ` (subset) " Ammar Faizi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJPAGdI5BITFBjXl@linux.gnuweeb.org \
--to=ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org \
--cc=alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org \
--cc=gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org \
--cc=reyuki@gnuweeb.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox