From: John Ernberg <j@j-ernberg.se>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linux Netdev Mailing List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Armando Budianto <sprite@gnuweeb.org>,
gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
John Ernberg <john.ernberg@actia.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: usbnet: Fix the wrong netif_carrier_on() call placement
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 22:57:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJuq00V5BD8OHGxF@nucleus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250805164747.40e63f6d@kernel.org>
Hi Jakub, Linus, Ammar,
(sorry for the delay, on vacation, wasn't paying attention to the internet)
On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 04:47:47PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2025 01:40:37 +0300 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So my gut feel is that the
> >
> > if (test_and_clear_bit(EVENT_LINK_CARRIER_ON, &dev->flags))
> > netif_carrier_on(dev->net);
> >
> > should actually be done outside that if-statement entirely, because it
> > literally ends up changing the thing that if-statement is testing.
>
> Right. I think it should be before the if (!netif_carrier_ok(dev->net))
>
> Ammar, could you retest and repost that, since we haven't heard from
> John?
I can't verify the suggested change until sometime in September, after I
return to office, but it feels correct.
However... I'm almost inclined to suggest a full revert of my patch as
the testing was clearly royally botched. Booting it on the boards I
have would have shown the failure immediately.
(I did see v3 of this patch being applied)
Apologies for the mess // John Ernberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-12 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-01 19:03 [PATCH net v2] net: usbnet: Fix the wrong netif_carrier_on() call placement Ammar Faizi
2025-08-04 10:00 ` Simon Horman
2025-08-05 20:28 ` Simon Horman
2025-08-05 21:16 ` Ammar Faizi
2025-08-05 22:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-08-05 23:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-08-05 23:57 ` Ammar Faizi
2025-08-12 20:57 ` John Ernberg [this message]
2025-08-05 23:56 ` Ammar Faizi
2025-08-06 0:05 ` Ammar Faizi
2025-08-06 1:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-08-06 1:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-08-07 1:37 ` Ammar Faizi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJuq00V5BD8OHGxF@nucleus \
--to=j@j-ernberg.se \
--cc=ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.ernberg@actia.se \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sprite@gnuweeb.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox