From: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
To: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <[email protected]>,
io-uring Mailing list <[email protected]>,
GNU/Weeb Mailing List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH liburing 2/2] src/Makefile: Add header files as dependency
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 07:41:14 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOG64qNjjy9j5QcdqSKjiETUFn6AZb6A4OKWN25nZdia=6X2ew@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/9/22 7:23 AM, Alviro Iskandar Setiawan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 6:06 AM Alviro Iskandar Setiawan wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:52 AM Ammar Faizi wrote:
>>> This is ugly, it blindly adds all of them to the dependency while
>>> they're actually not dependencies for all the C files here. For
>>> example, when compiling for x86, we don't touch aarch64 files.
>>>
>>> It is not a problem for liburing at the moment, because we don't
>>> have many files in the src directory now. But I think we better
>>> provide a long term solution on this.
>>>
>>> For the headers files, I think we should rely on the compilers to
>>> generate the dependency list with something like:
>>>
>>> "-MT ... -MMD -MP -MF"
>>>
>>> Then include the generated dependency list to the Makefile.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> Yes, I think it's better to do that. I'll fix this in v2.
>> thx
>
> Sir, I am a bit confused with the include dependency files to the Makefile.
>
> I use like this:
>
> -MT <object_filename> -MMD -MP -MF <dependency_file>
>
> the dependency file is generated, but how to include them dynamically?
> I think it shouldn't be included one by one.
>
> So after this
>
> [...] -MT "setup.os" -MMD -MP -MF ".deps/setup.os.d" [...]
> [...] -MT "queue.os" -MMD -MP -MF ".deps/queue.os.d" [...]
> [...] -MT "register.os" -MMD -MP -MF ".deps/register.os.d" [...]
> [...] -MT "syscall.os" -MMD -MP -MF ".deps/syscall.os.d" [...]
>
> files .deps/{setup,queue,registers,syscall}.os.d are generated, but I
> have to include them to Makefile right? How to include them all at
> once?
Untested, but I think you can do something like:
-include $(liburing_objs:%=.deps/%.d)
where liburing_objs is the variable that contains:
{setup,queue,registers,syscall}.os.
--
Ammar Faizi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-09 0:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-08 22:40 [PATCH liburing 0/2] Changes for src/Makefile Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2022-03-08 22:40 ` [PATCH liburing 1/2] src/Makefile: Remove `-fomit-frame-pointer` from default build Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2022-03-08 22:40 ` [PATCH liburing 2/2] src/Makefile: Add header files as dependency Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2022-03-08 22:52 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-08 23:06 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2022-03-09 0:23 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
2022-03-09 0:41 ` Ammar Faizi [this message]
2022-03-08 22:58 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-03-08 23:07 ` Alviro Iskandar Setiawan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox