Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Change mov $0, %reg with xor %reg, %reg

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

On August 5, 2022 2:26:02 AM PDT, David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> 
wrote:
>From: Kanna Scarlet
>> Sent: 04 August 2022 19:08
>> 
>> On 8/4/22 10:53 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> > Bonus points if you find out what other advantage
>> >
>> > XOR reg,reg
>> >
>> > has when it comes to clearing integer registers.
>> 
>> Hello sir Borislav,
>> 
>> Thank you for your response. I tried to find out other advantages of
>> xor reg,reg on Google and found this:
>> https://stackoverflow.com/a/33668295/7275114
>> 
>>   "xor (being a recognized zeroing idiom, unlike mov reg, 0) has some
>>   obvious and some subtle advantages:
>> 
>>   1. smaller code-size than mov reg,0. (All CPUs)
>>   2. avoids partial-register penalties for later code.
>>      (Intel P6-family and SnB-family).
>>   3. doesn't use an execution unit, saving power and freeing up
>>      execution resources. (Intel SnB-family)
>>   4. smaller uop (no immediate data) leaves room in the uop cache-line
>>      for nearby instructions to borrow if needed. (Intel SnB-family).
>>   5. doesn't use up entries in the physical register file. (Intel
>>      SnB-family (and P4) at least, possibly AMD as well since they use
>>      a similar PRF design instead of keeping register state in the ROB
>>      like Intel P6-family microarchitectures.)"
>
>You missed one, and an additional change:
>
>Use "xor %rax,%rax" instead of "xor %eax,%eax" to save
>the 'reg' prefix.
>
>	David
>
>-
>Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
>Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
>
>

You mean the other way around...