From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received: from [192.168.210.80] (unknown [182.2.39.249])
	by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 709CF80866;
	Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:49:39 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org;
	s=default; t=1661950181;
	bh=sWhmB48+CpsYidosfk7YN5KGosrDH8LsGjxmfJliJAQ=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=r2twf6P6ZRwzQ70Ma3uEUG6fKzhzMU+IbuQ0DqMc/gYfQNprRnLMHAPm80GNF4eWV
	 VeARIcSJG7Cz9+wtWSoCF4jeeZZmzuSUOmfzAmOTlynOF9kSdltvlWIk98hg/kw4gu
	 Qs/YYa7espqEyiGl+lCUgkASp+cmlJ2ujz5Myt0T8K9xGugIYwNgEB9Le1/m7JQshg
	 CNVUm/jMPuJmkVtIYmiVCfghv+XP5wf34buhJFpdlxxadWk0Ol330aLPv8DfQGX6Wy
	 QsdPo595cNS4lJBoEz/wfHnSybphwGOwDiAR6hKB1rdseCoSAyjRMWwqdONGMac3p7
	 YvIe+UzWPrw9A==
Message-ID: <b72de26e-8c7f-614a-7835-6e53955b733c@gnuweeb.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 19:49:36 +0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
To: Georg Koppen <gk@torproject.org>
Cc: bad-relays <bad-relays@lists.torproject.org>,
 GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>,
 Louvian Lyndal <louvianlyndal@gmail.com>
References: <e30e695a-f776-841e-8eff-c06255b4e8f0@torproject.org>
 <291c272c-f3c6-6479-1b00-bf8c57ec9cf6@gnuweeb.org>
 <6827c274-5a85-aa8f-b41f-ccf520d7aad6@torproject.org>
 <1f42f7e1-8691-5b15-36c3-a7470294867c@gnuweeb.org>
 <903389a3-1c36-4bf3-cb30-7c12cb9b98ed@gnuweeb.org>
 <2aba6c4e-04c9-3e66-1293-583e68d8307d@torproject.org>
 <d0054878-c64e-4520-4cd9-fad311467f1e@gnuweeb.org>
 <c146a680-2e3b-c150-6908-b9c0ce24e8fb@gnuweeb.org>
 <0238b664-2822-7db1-da0e-3f4424737b51@torproject.org>
 <6e0c8443-8e10-2b2c-6401-39d72f8d4455@gnuweeb.org>
 <50a99217-06d5-6404-9e5a-070dd1777d14@torproject.org>
 <8139f3ff-0f6e-b363-dda8-f5a8f4265732@gnuweeb.org>
Subject: Re: Your TeaInside relay is failing to relay exit traffic
In-Reply-To: <8139f3ff-0f6e-b363-dda8-f5a8f4265732@gnuweeb.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: <gwml.vger.gnuweeb.org>

On 8/31/22 2:48 PM, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> On 8/31/22 2:25 PM, Georg Koppen wrote:
>> The problem was that I still saw the same issues yesterday when testing
>> and got the directory authorities to badexit your node as I did not know
>> how long this problem persisted. I can redo my test later today and see
>> how that goes. 

I am curious on what my exit relay is currently doing. I have a question:

What is my exit relay doing when it's marked as BadExit?

I still see the Tor daemon consuming CPU and network I/O despite it doesn't
relay exit traffic (per BadExit flag).

[
    I'm not a Tor expert, but I guess it acts as a guard or middle node.
    Doesn't it?

    #correct_me_if_i_am_wrong
]

-- 
Ammar Faizi