From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received: from [192.168.12.80] (unknown [182.2.69.158])
	by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 561D87E2BC;
	Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:43:46 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org;
	s=default; t=1647953029;
	bh=ie93YiRfMjsPc2WJj9+BJSUmlGPc1OBg4+w1HWqwKKo=;
	h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=J28lNxfQG/G2ZhfYeMrrtdF1Tenb+RxCRsZzuBp6eTs7dQFLOQ7KJdeHRPZoFbvXr
	 KmQ18dMrXSygPF7/90gfvZrK2S8LoOtqsHnzuAoKbcHVkuTEzVNDOSdasTaTHaEzDH
	 gHEzZ6w9lvpFs6FKo1eyexuiR1EDF3ewtHr8Uw0TdMZDCx3HY2PA/onz1h2WMIneQY
	 KKlGJtxXOaua41J6Dzo+bMy6Nya1q9T2D4Jq7qQWO88slEaSH1Euavc0PlYL1jXbHr
	 ihB9L7kK1qWRUUMkQcigx6AsZW88stqxo9PmeK0hvQvkqhp83O+kIVSgReAIhHfW4u
	 08ozFBl+pqtOQ==
Message-ID: <b998a2a3-a4e6-cf4f-9de7-0224f73ae88b@gnuweeb.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:43:43 +0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Add dynamic memory allocator support for
 nolibc
Content-Language: en-US
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
 Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@gnuweeb.org>,
 Nugraha <richiisei@gmail.com>,
 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>
References: <20220322102115.186179-1-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
 <20220322112725.GC10306@1wt.eu>
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220322112725.GC10306@1wt.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: <gwml.vger.gnuweeb.org>

On 3/22/22 6:27 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Ammar,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:21:07PM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is the v2 of RFC to add dynamic memory allocator support for
>> nolibc.
> So overall, except for the syscall6 implementation whereI agree with
> David that it would be better to always use the "push" variant, I'm
> fine with the rest of the series.

Will send a non-RFC patchset for this...

-- 
Ammar Faizi