From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from [10.7.7.14] (unknown [182.253.88.229]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8506D804D1; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 01:15:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=default; t=1667783721; bh=GZDA5FionKkmZryjQ2U3DEXyZQDtgaqXL0/mkvfqGGg=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ugya2DF3E+2Xj1jIahXLjUdpy2CUAFqEwDW0Ce5D70j9JFYzb/ANjMUGst1Ee1rLf MNLq2HRGDaRSobsuCqh9tpEXJW27599cae/J4BWT+Jv+KAIkL8a9CEp53T4lNdallT wgYH7Lg1hB29U2sp4t1hJQpk8r8nX5Cn/4HaTy4xyyBVu679UK4YT7eK8FpmPu0dTy drxgYlcB9KfPogXCUJ8R4hLbpGlO9aGliCmqpSn/F5pjFTZag5yo/UdWBaEyuPscLf vN+VHPyDhdV4PAz5c6EGiOlBl0TTqfdFMNe3/EYMK87hOIQKVwFTFxJNY0Fx20mN70 DT9x4gX0mDR7Q== Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 08:15:18 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/16] utils: Change on max for TO/CC header list Content-Language: en-US To: Muhammad Rizki Cc: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan , GNU/Weeb Mailing List References: <20221104180931.3852-1-kiizuha@gnuweeb.org> <20221104180931.3852-4-kiizuha@gnuweeb.org> <0c2c7b6e-3b0c-db90-7202-54e468331565@gnuweeb.org> <064c6352-4b26-c859-caec-25015642bd7a@gnuweeb.org> From: Ammar Faizi In-Reply-To: <064c6352-4b26-c859-caec-25015642bd7a@gnuweeb.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: On 11/7/22 8:08 AM, Muhammad Rizki wrote: > When I tested the bot, one of the patch email causing > MediaCaptionTooLong error, the problem is from the CC is too long, while > I set the max to 15 it's fixed the error. Yes, it works with your case. But how do you guarantee that 15 participants always yield a total of characters less than 1024? Just because it fixes your case, it doesn't mean the underlying 1024 limit problem is fixed. -- Ammar Faizi