From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [RFC 11/11] io_uring: lock-free task_work stack
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 14:44:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7c3d1a6d7a038f414658314eeeadbbd186c1435.1650548192.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Instead of keeping a list of task_work items keep them in a lock-free
stack. However, we still would like to keep the ordering guarantees, so
reverse the list upon execution in io_uring_task_work_run().
First, for each tw add it a spin_lock/unlock_irq() pair with a single
cmpxchg(). Same on the execution side but per batch. And it also kills
the final lock/unlock at the end of io_uring_task_work_run().
The main downside here is that we need to reverse the tw list on
execution messing up with caches.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 51b6ee2b70f2..97b5559bb660 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -506,10 +506,8 @@ struct io_uring_task {
struct percpu_counter inflight;
atomic_t in_idle;
- spinlock_t task_lock;
- struct io_wq_work_list task_list;
+ struct io_task_work *task_list;
struct file **registered_rings;
- bool task_running;
};
/*
@@ -860,7 +858,7 @@ typedef void (*io_req_tw_func_t)(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked);
struct io_task_work {
union {
- struct io_wq_work_node node;
+ struct io_task_work *next;
struct llist_node fallback_node;
};
io_req_tw_func_t func;
@@ -2482,15 +2480,29 @@ static inline void ctx_commit_and_unlock(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
}
-static void handle_tw_list(struct io_wq_work_node *node,
+static struct io_task_work tw_work_exited; /* all we need is ->next == NULL */
+
+static void handle_tw_list(struct io_task_work *node,
struct io_ring_ctx **ctx, bool *locked)
{
+ struct io_task_work *next;
+ struct io_task_work *prev = NULL;
+
+ /* reverse the list */
+ while (node->next) {
+ next = node->next;
+ node->next = prev;
+ prev = node;
+ node = next;
+ }
+ node->next = prev;
+
do {
- struct io_wq_work_node *next = node->next;
struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(node, struct io_kiocb,
- io_task_work.node);
+ io_task_work);
- prefetch(container_of(next, struct io_kiocb, io_task_work.node));
+ next = node->next;
+ prefetch(container_of(next, struct io_kiocb, io_task_work));
if (req->ctx != *ctx) {
ctx_flush_and_put(*ctx, locked);
@@ -2511,25 +2523,27 @@ void io_uring_task_work_run(void)
if (!tctx)
return;
+ /*
+ * The poison is only assigned from the task context we're currently in.
+ * Nobody can set it while io_uring_task_work_run() is running
+ */
+ if (READ_ONCE(tctx->task_list) == &tw_work_exited)
+ return;
- while (1) {
- struct io_wq_work_node *node2;
-
- spin_lock_irq(&tctx->task_lock);
- node2 = tctx->task_list.first;
- INIT_WQ_LIST(&tctx->task_list);
- if (!node2)
- tctx->task_running = false;
- spin_unlock_irq(&tctx->task_lock);
- if (!node2)
+ do {
+ struct io_task_work *head = xchg(&tctx->task_list, NULL);
+
+ if (unlikely(!head))
break;
+ handle_tw_list(head, &ctx, &uring_locked);
- handle_tw_list(node2, &ctx, &uring_locked);
cond_resched();
-
- if (data_race(!tctx->task_list.first) && uring_locked)
- io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
- }
+ if (READ_ONCE(tctx->task_list))
+ continue;
+ if (!uring_locked)
+ break;
+ io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
+ } while (READ_ONCE(tctx->task_list));
ctx_flush_and_put(ctx, &uring_locked);
}
@@ -2538,26 +2552,26 @@ static void io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, bool priority)
{
struct task_struct *tsk = req->task;
struct io_uring_task *tctx = tsk->io_uring;
- struct io_wq_work_node *node;
- unsigned long flags;
- bool running;
+ struct io_task_work *head;
WARN_ON_ONCE(!tctx);
io_drop_inflight_file(req);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tctx->task_lock, flags);
- wq_list_add_tail(&req->io_task_work.node, &tctx->task_list);
- if (unlikely(atomic_read(&tctx->in_idle)))
- goto cancel_locked;
+ do {
+ head = READ_ONCE(tctx->task_list);
+ if (unlikely(head == &tw_work_exited)) {
+ req_set_fail(req);
+ if (llist_add(&req->io_task_work.fallback_node,
+ &req->ctx->fallback_llist))
+ schedule_delayed_work(&req->ctx->fallback_work, 1);
+ return;
+ }
- running = tctx->task_running;
- if (!running)
- tctx->task_running = true;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tctx->task_lock, flags);
+ req->io_task_work.next = head;
+ } while (cmpxchg(&tctx->task_list, head, &req->io_task_work) != head);
- /* task_work already pending, we're done */
- if (!running) {
+ if (!head) {
/*
* SQPOLL kernel thread doesn't need notification, just a wakeup. For
* all other cases, use TWA_SIGNAL unconditionally to ensure we're
@@ -2569,22 +2583,6 @@ static void io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, bool priority)
else
task_work_notify(tsk, TWA_SIGNAL);
}
- return;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tctx->task_lock, flags);
-cancel_locked:
- node = tctx->task_list.first;
- INIT_WQ_LIST(&tctx->task_list);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tctx->task_lock, flags);
-
- while (node) {
- req = container_of(node, struct io_kiocb, io_task_work.node);
- req_set_fail(req);
- node = node->next;
- if (llist_add(&req->io_task_work.fallback_node,
- &req->ctx->fallback_llist))
- schedule_delayed_work(&req->ctx->fallback_work, 1);
- }
}
static void io_req_task_cancel(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
@@ -7977,7 +7975,7 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
if (!sqt_spin && (ret > 0 || !wq_list_empty(&ctx->iopoll_list)))
sqt_spin = true;
}
- if (tctx->task_running) {
+ if (READ_ONCE(tctx->task_list)) {
io_uring_task_work_run();
sqt_spin = true;
}
@@ -7990,7 +7988,7 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
}
prepare_to_wait(&sqd->wait, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- if (!io_sqd_events_pending(sqd) && !tctx->task_running) {
+ if (!io_sqd_events_pending(sqd) && !READ_ONCE(tctx->task_list)) {
bool needs_sched = true;
list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list) {
@@ -9088,8 +9086,6 @@ static __cold int io_uring_alloc_task_context(struct task_struct *task,
init_waitqueue_head(&tctx->wait);
atomic_set(&tctx->in_idle, 0);
task->io_uring = tctx;
- spin_lock_init(&tctx->task_lock);
- INIT_WQ_LIST(&tctx->task_list);
return 0;
}
@@ -10301,16 +10297,16 @@ static __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool cancel_all,
if (!current->io_uring)
return;
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(READ_ONCE(tctx->task_list) == &tw_work_exited))
+ return;
if (tctx->io_wq)
io_wq_exit_start(tctx->io_wq);
+ while (cmpxchg(&tctx->task_list, NULL, &tw_work_exited) != NULL)
+ io_uring_task_work_run();
- spin_lock_irq(&tctx->task_lock);
atomic_inc(&tctx->in_idle);
- spin_unlock_irq(&tctx->task_lock);
-
do {
io_uring_drop_tctx_refs(current);
- io_run_task_work();
/* read completions before cancelations */
inflight = tctx_inflight(tctx, !cancel_all);
if (!inflight)
@@ -10335,10 +10331,6 @@ static __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool cancel_all,
prepare_to_wait(&tctx->wait, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
io_run_task_work();
- if (tctx->task_running) {
- __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- io_uring_task_work_run();
- }
io_uring_drop_tctx_refs(current);
/*
--
2.36.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-21 13:44 [RFC 00/11] io_uring specific task_work infra Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 01/11] io_uring: optimise io_req_task_work_add Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 02/11] io_uringg: add io_should_fail_tw() helper Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 03/11] io_uring: ban tw queue for exiting processes Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 04/11] io_uring: don't take ctx refs in tctx_task_work() Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 05/11] io_uring: add dummy io_uring_task_work_run() Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 06/11] task_work: add helper for signalling a task Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 07/11] io_uring: run io_uring task_works on TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 08/11] io_uring: wire io_uring specific task work Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 09/11] io_uring: refactor io_run_task_work() Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` [RFC 10/11] io_uring: remove priority tw list Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-21 13:44 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2022-04-22 8:45 ` [RFC 00/11] io_uring specific task_work infra Hao Xu
2022-04-22 11:54 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7c3d1a6d7a038f414658314eeeadbbd186c1435.1650548192.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox