From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from [10.7.7.5] (unknown [182.253.183.184]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 016557E2BA; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 13:36:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=default; t=1672148207; bh=EAmnj0RlIG0MGwi3OSqM2CbWUp31upcL4Rr7mE3BEzk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=m3vFWGgFos4CVm/6DKMfvLRN3lO3Hf8erFN7TuCBwpYdoRs5SfWZcewOZyO2yKniC PhHPT0lNHM20h0JbVMUIz5AgtdblS2c/vDzoQcqw7sy3p1kBoMd/53NX+Z9S4weeul WKhSisQDra81GMtPICtyInDEtD2enrqqqrhr48cbccPliJOU5u1veaQ+ffJm1B1zvm jWk+ckJjVJgeG95ZIVAcdGqMAPg6sb9i6Vgb2m9/b/XxNZpYXl5R2M5hqpM9+fPTH1 7Ex289a63N1CVaG/s9F8wMDiRCuN9TPxoiATEeyktBNqg/PoJxHI4ze8Lnrpa5dXCM 54+J+p+MRtnRw== Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 20:36:41 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] nolibc signal handling support Content-Language: en-US To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Shuah Khan , "Paul E. McKenney" , Gilang Fachrezy , VNLX Kernel Department , Alviro Iskandar Setiawan , Kanna Scarlet , Muhammad Rizki , GNU/Weeb Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Kselftest Mailing List References: <20221222035134.3467659-1-ammar.faizi@intel.com> <20221222043452.GB29086@1wt.eu> <20221222134615.3535422-1-ammar.faizi@intel.com> <20221227062640.GA5337@1wt.eu> <00eee75f-59fa-83b2-c7e1-f0da347b2dde@gnuweeb.org> From: Ammar Faizi In-Reply-To: <00eee75f-59fa-83b2-c7e1-f0da347b2dde@gnuweeb.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: On 12/27/22 8:32 PM, Ammar Faizi wrote: >> Thus now my focus will be on storing these variables where relevant >> for all archs, so that your getauxval() implementation works on top >> of it. It will be much cleaner and will also improve programs' ease >> of implementation and reliability. > > Are you going to wire up a patchset for it? > > If so, I'll wait for it. When it's already committed, I'll base this > series on top it. > > Or I take your series locally then submit your patches and mine in a > single series. > > What do you prefer? Side note: I only know x86 Assembly. So unfortunately, I can't get them working on all arch(s). -- Ammar Faizi