public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Olivier Langlois <[email protected]>,
	Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Hao Xu <[email protected]>,
	io-uring <[email protected]>,
	linux-kernel <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] io_uring: minor io_cqring_wait() optimization
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:43:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 3/8/22 10:36 PM, Olivier Langlois wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-03-08 at 17:54 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 3/8/22 3:17 PM, Olivier Langlois wrote:
>>> Move up the block manipulating the sig variable to execute code
>>> that may encounter an error and exit first before continuing
>>> executing the rest of the function and avoid useless computations
>>
>> I don't think this is worthwhile doing. If you're hitting an error
>> in any of them, it's by definition not the fast path.
>>
> Well, by itself it is not a big improvement but it is still an
> improvement.
> 
> but most importantly, it has to be considered in the context of the
> current patchset because in patch #2, the following step is to
> 
> 1. acquire the napi spin lock
> 2. splice the context napi list into a local one.
> 3. release the lock
> 
> If this patch is not in place before patch #2, you would need undo all
> that before returning from the sig block which would make the function
> bigger when all that is completely avoidable by accepting this patch...
> 
> Both patches were together in v1 but I decided to break them apart
> thinking that this was the right thing to do...

Yeah ok, it does make sense in the context of patch 2. Thanks!

-- 
Jens Axboe



       reply	other threads:[~2022-03-09 23:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <[email protected]>
     [not found] ` <84513f7cc1b1fb31d8f4cb910aee033391d036b4.1646777484.git.olivier@trillion01.com>
     [not found]   ` <[email protected]>
     [not found]     ` <[email protected]>
2022-03-09 23:43       ` Jens Axboe [this message]
     [not found] ` <[email protected]>
     [not found]   ` <[email protected]>
2022-03-09 23:44     ` [PATCH v5 0/2] io_uring: Add support for napi_busy_poll Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox