From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on gnuweeb.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from [192.168.88.254] (unknown [125.160.106.238]) by gnuweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E6EF7E328; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 01:06:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gnuweeb.org; s=default; t=1659056772; bh=1YuEaXdHJ8ykZBdavGMOWusNpJTXfEmRwIfW8Ttdyxg=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=E8BpbOwsmsTpSQmEB0H9Oazhzev1cs8hH2xg1YJ2woi06tXC1oJdOgR1AjeB0uFy2 bHeAuLgAyleHmBP7pNo+55vVk1LQCkH+w4SfIHpSkrjs6YzXwv3aLMmbq/I/LLErZr ELH/DaYC+OFQRO0Mvyw9gtUgGIkMD2FO201qOQBk1YyGPPCwSji3L1QV61cjWd74dj ll512iG4KdtgS9lE4zu3SxR6AwUbMZEHT6mWj8XUgEtBhUkpG2PSa5+KeRyxVO6dcQ gxIt/CxENbuN5Cc5apt0qfxOzDkBhOjA6Xpmw6UqKjfo9Q5hEkRiK4VNvtMbbj6uOo YQ+2oEXm6lFAg== Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 08:06:05 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] New feature to handle atom URLs and broadcast Content-Language: en-US To: Muhammad Rizki Cc: GNU/Weeb Mailing List References: <20220729004507.1668-1-kiizuha@gnuweeb.org> <0075cdba-8b4d-6983-d2ae-eda902edc65a@gnuweeb.org> From: Ammar Faizi In-Reply-To: <0075cdba-8b4d-6983-d2ae-eda902edc65a@gnuweeb.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: On 7/29/22 8:01 AM, Muhammad Rizki wrote: > On 29/07/2022 07.57, Ammar Faizi wrote: >> Rizki, >> >> On 7/29/22 7:44 AM, Muhammad Rizki wrote: >>> Morning sir, >>> >>> In this series I want to create a new feature to handle the atom URLs >>> and broadcast chats, such as add atom, add chat, del_atom and del_chat, >>> with this feature, we do not manual manage them again, just using >>> the bot commands and it will update in database. >> >> This series doesn't address the previous reviews. > > I don't understand, can you explain? Before sending a new revision, make sure you collect and address all comments you get. Maintainers like me hate reading the same mistake being posted. -- Ammar Faizi