From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: GWML post from [email protected] requires approval
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 00:00:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 416 bytes --]
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List: [email protected]
From: [email protected]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] io_uring: Rename `io_{send,recv}` to `io_{sendto,recvfrom}`
Reason: Too many recipients to the message
At your convenience, visit:
https://gwml.gnuweeb.org/admindb/gwml
to approve or deny the request.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 4417 bytes --]
From: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>, io-uring Mailing List <[email protected]>, netdev Mailing List <[email protected]>, GNU/Weeb Mailing List <[email protected]>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]>, Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>, "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>, Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>, Nugra <[email protected]>, Praveen Kumar <[email protected]>, Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] io_uring: Rename `io_{send,recv}` to `io_{sendto,recvfrom}`
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:00:03 +0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Currently we can perform `send` and `recv` via io_uring. And now, we
are going to add `sendto` and `recvfrom` support for io_uring.
Note that:
Calling `send(fd, buf, len, flags)` is equivalent to calling
`sendto(fd, buf, len, flags, NULL, 0)`. Therefore, `sendto`
is a superset of `send`.
Calling `recv(fd, buf, len, flags)` is equivalent to calling
`recvfrom(fd, buf, len, flags, NULL, NULL)`. Therefore, `recvfrom`
is a superset of `recv`.
As such, let's direct the current supported `IORING_OP_{SEND,RECV}` to
`io_{sendto,recvfrom}`. These functions will also be used for
`IORING_OP_{SENDTO,RECVFROM}` operation in the next patches.
Cc: Nugra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
---
v4:
- Rebase the work (sync with "for-next" branch in Jens' tree).
v3:
- Fix build error when CONFIG_NET is undefined for PATCH 1/3. I
tried to fix it in PATCH 3/3, but it should be fixed in PATCH 1/3,
otherwise it breaks the build in PATCH 1/3.
v2:
- Added Nugra to CC list (tester).
---
---
fs/io_uring.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index d5da4a898fe8..5e45e4d6969c 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -4947,7 +4947,7 @@ static int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
return 0;
}
-static int io_send(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
+static int io_sendto(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct io_sr_msg *sr = &req->sr_msg;
struct msghdr msg;
@@ -5173,7 +5173,7 @@ static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
return 0;
}
-static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
+static int io_recvfrom(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct io_buffer *kbuf;
struct io_sr_msg *sr = &req->sr_msg;
@@ -5381,8 +5381,8 @@ IO_NETOP_PREP_ASYNC(sendmsg);
IO_NETOP_PREP_ASYNC(recvmsg);
IO_NETOP_PREP_ASYNC(connect);
IO_NETOP_PREP(accept);
-IO_NETOP_FN(send);
-IO_NETOP_FN(recv);
+IO_NETOP_FN(sendto);
+IO_NETOP_FN(recvfrom);
#endif /* CONFIG_NET */
struct io_poll_table {
@@ -6710,13 +6710,13 @@ static int io_issue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
ret = io_sendmsg(req, issue_flags);
break;
case IORING_OP_SEND:
- ret = io_send(req, issue_flags);
+ ret = io_sendto(req, issue_flags);
break;
case IORING_OP_RECVMSG:
ret = io_recvmsg(req, issue_flags);
break;
case IORING_OP_RECV:
- ret = io_recv(req, issue_flags);
+ ret = io_recvfrom(req, issue_flags);
break;
case IORING_OP_TIMEOUT:
ret = io_timeout(req, issue_flags);
--
2.32.0
[-- Attachment #3: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 677 bytes --]
From: [email protected]
Subject: confirm 6435d502b0662c22edf126199b70fda6f0950887
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 00:00:28 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
Mailman will discard the held message. Do this if the message is
spam. If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
to the list. The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
of the body of the reply.
next reply other threads:[~2022-01-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-07 0:00 gwml-owner [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-01-07 11:02 GWML post from [email protected] requires approval gwml-owner
2022-01-07 0:00 gwml-owner
2022-01-07 0:00 gwml-owner
2022-01-07 0:00 gwml-owner
2021-05-26 9:00 gwml-owner
2021-05-26 7:48 gwml-owner
2021-05-25 15:29 gwml-owner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox