* [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] io_uring: add napi busy polling support @ 2022-11-07 17:52 Stefan Roesch 2022-11-07 17:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] " Stefan Roesch 2022-11-07 17:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] io_uring: add api to set napi busy poll timeout Stefan Roesch 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Stefan Roesch @ 2022-11-07 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernel-team; +Cc: shr, axboe, olivier, netdev, io-uring, kuba This adds the napi busy polling support in io_uring.c. It adds a new napi_list to the io_ring_ctx structure. This list contains the list of napi_id's that are currently enabled for busy polling. This list is used to determine which napi id's enabled busy polling. To set the new napi busy poll timeout, a new io-uring api has been added. It sets the napi busy poll timeout for the corresponding ring. There is also a corresponding liburing patch series, which enables this feature. The name of the series is "liburing: add add api for napi busy poll timeout". It also contains two programs to test the this. Testing has shown that the round-trip times are reduced to 38us from 55us by enabling napi busy polling with a busy poll timeout of 100us. Changes: - v2: - Add missing defines if CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL is not defined - Changes signature of function io_napi_add_list to static inline if CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL is not defined - define some functions as static Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]> Stefan Roesch (2): io_uring: add napi busy polling support io_uring: add api to set napi busy poll timeout. include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 6 + include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 4 + io_uring/io_uring.c | 262 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ io_uring/napi.h | 22 +++ io_uring/poll.c | 3 + io_uring/sqpoll.c | 9 ++ 6 files changed, 306 insertions(+) create mode 100644 io_uring/napi.h base-commit: f0c4d9fc9cc9462659728d168387191387e903cc -- 2.30.2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] io_uring: add napi busy polling support 2022-11-07 17:52 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] io_uring: add napi busy polling support Stefan Roesch @ 2022-11-07 17:52 ` Stefan Roesch 2022-11-07 18:33 ` Eric Dumazet 2022-11-09 0:56 ` Jakub Kicinski 2022-11-07 17:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] io_uring: add api to set napi busy poll timeout Stefan Roesch 1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Stefan Roesch @ 2022-11-07 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernel-team; +Cc: shr, axboe, olivier, netdev, io-uring, kuba This adds the napi busy polling support in io_uring.c. It adds a new napi_list to the io_ring_ctx structure. This list contains the list of napi_id's that are currently enabled for busy polling. The list is synchronized by the new napi_lock spin lock. The current default napi busy polling time is stored in napi_busy_poll_to. If napi busy polling is not enabled, the value is 0. The busy poll timeout is also stored as part of the io_wait_queue. This is necessary as for sq polling the poll interval needs to be adjusted and the napi callback allows only to pass in one value. Testing has shown that the round-trip times are reduced to 38us from 55us by enabling napi busy polling with a busy poll timeout of 100us. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Olivier Langlois <[email protected]> --- include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 6 + io_uring/io_uring.c | 240 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ io_uring/napi.h | 22 +++ io_uring/poll.c | 3 + io_uring/sqpoll.c | 9 ++ 5 files changed, 280 insertions(+) create mode 100644 io_uring/napi.h diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h index f5b687a787a3..84b446b0d215 100644 --- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h +++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h @@ -270,6 +270,12 @@ struct io_ring_ctx { struct xarray personalities; u32 pers_next; +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL + struct list_head napi_list; /* track busy poll napi_id */ + spinlock_t napi_lock; /* napi_list lock */ + unsigned int napi_busy_poll_to; /* napi busy poll default timeout */ +#endif + struct { /* * We cache a range of free CQEs we can use, once exhausted it diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c index ac8c488e3077..b02bba4ebcbf 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ #include "rsrc.h" #include "cancel.h" #include "net.h" +#include "napi.h" #include "notif.h" #include "timeout.h" @@ -327,6 +328,13 @@ static __cold struct io_ring_ctx *io_ring_ctx_alloc(struct io_uring_params *p) INIT_WQ_LIST(&ctx->locked_free_list); INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ctx->fallback_work, io_fallback_req_func); INIT_WQ_LIST(&ctx->submit_state.compl_reqs); + +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->napi_list); + spin_lock_init(&ctx->napi_lock); + ctx->napi_busy_poll_to = READ_ONCE(sysctl_net_busy_poll); +#endif + return ctx; err: kfree(ctx->dummy_ubuf); @@ -2303,6 +2311,10 @@ struct io_wait_queue { struct io_ring_ctx *ctx; unsigned cq_tail; unsigned nr_timeouts; + +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL + unsigned int busy_poll_to; +#endif }; static inline bool io_has_work(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) @@ -2376,6 +2388,198 @@ static inline int io_cqring_wait_schedule(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, return 1; } +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL +#define NAPI_TIMEOUT (60 * SEC_CONVERSION) + +struct io_napi_entry { + struct list_head list; + unsigned int napi_id; + unsigned long timeout; +}; + +static bool io_napi_busy_loop_on(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) +{ + return READ_ONCE(ctx->napi_busy_poll_to); +} + +/* + * io_napi_add() - Add napi id to the busy poll list + * @file: file pointer for socket + * @ctx: io-uring context + * + * Add the napi id of the socket to the napi busy poll list. + */ +void io_napi_add(struct file *file, struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) +{ + unsigned int napi_id; + struct socket *sock; + struct sock *sk; + struct io_napi_entry *ne; + + if (!io_napi_busy_loop_on(ctx)) + return; + + sock = sock_from_file(file); + if (!sock) + return; + + sk = sock->sk; + if (!sk) + return; + + napi_id = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_napi_id); + + /* Non-NAPI IDs can be rejected */ + if (napi_id < MIN_NAPI_ID) + return; + + spin_lock(&ctx->napi_lock); + list_for_each_entry(ne, &ctx->napi_list, list) { + if (ne->napi_id == napi_id) { + ne->timeout = jiffies + NAPI_TIMEOUT; + goto out; + } + } + + ne = kmalloc(sizeof(*ne), GFP_NOWAIT); + if (!ne) + goto out; + + ne->napi_id = napi_id; + ne->timeout = jiffies + NAPI_TIMEOUT; + list_add_tail(&ne->list, &ctx->napi_list); + +out: + spin_unlock(&ctx->napi_lock); +} + +static void io_napi_free_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) +{ + spin_lock(&ctx->napi_lock); + while (!list_empty(&ctx->napi_list)) { + struct io_napi_entry *ne = + list_first_entry(&ctx->napi_list, + struct io_napi_entry, list); + + list_del(&ne->list); + kfree(ne); + } + spin_unlock(&ctx->napi_lock); +} + +static void io_napi_adjust_busy_loop_timeout(unsigned int poll_to, + struct timespec64 *ts, + unsigned int *new_poll_to) +{ + struct timespec64 pollto = ns_to_timespec64(1000 * (s64)poll_to); + + if (timespec64_compare(ts, &pollto) > 0) { + *ts = timespec64_sub(*ts, pollto); + *new_poll_to = poll_to; + } else { + u64 to = timespec64_to_ns(ts); + + do_div(to, 1000); + *new_poll_to = to; + ts->tv_sec = 0; + ts->tv_nsec = 0; + } +} + +static inline bool io_napi_busy_loop_timeout(unsigned long start_time, + unsigned long bp_usec) +{ + if (bp_usec) { + unsigned long end_time = start_time + bp_usec; + unsigned long now = busy_loop_current_time(); + + return time_after(now, end_time); + } + return true; +} + +static inline void io_napi_check_entry_timeout(struct io_napi_entry *ne) +{ + if (time_after(jiffies, ne->timeout)) { + list_del(&ne->list); + kfree(ne); + } +} + +/* + * io_napi_busy_loop() - napi busy poll loop + * @napi_list: list of napi_id's supporting busy polling + * + * This invokes the napi busy poll loop if sockets have been added to the + * napi busy poll list. + * + * Returns if all napi-id's in the list have been processed. + */ +bool io_napi_busy_loop(struct list_head *napi_list) +{ + struct io_napi_entry *ne; + struct io_napi_entry *n; + + list_for_each_entry_safe(ne, n, napi_list, list) { + napi_busy_loop(ne->napi_id, NULL, NULL, true, BUSY_POLL_BUDGET); + io_napi_check_entry_timeout(ne); + } + + return !list_empty(napi_list); +} + +static bool io_napi_busy_loop_end(void *p, unsigned long start_time) +{ + struct io_wait_queue *iowq = p; + + return signal_pending(current) || + io_should_wake(iowq) || + io_napi_busy_loop_timeout(start_time, iowq->busy_poll_to); +} + +static void io_napi_blocking_busy_loop(struct list_head *napi_list, + struct io_wait_queue *iowq) +{ + unsigned long start_time = list_is_singular(napi_list) + ? 0 + : busy_loop_current_time(); + + do { + if (list_is_singular(napi_list)) { + struct io_napi_entry *ne = + list_first_entry(napi_list, + struct io_napi_entry, list); + + napi_busy_loop(ne->napi_id, io_napi_busy_loop_end, iowq, + true, BUSY_POLL_BUDGET); + io_napi_check_entry_timeout(ne); + break; + } + } while (io_napi_busy_loop(napi_list) && + !io_napi_busy_loop_end(iowq, start_time)); +} + +static void io_napi_putback_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, + struct list_head *napi_list) +{ + struct io_napi_entry *cne; + struct io_napi_entry *lne; + + spin_lock(&ctx->napi_lock); + list_for_each_entry(cne, &ctx->napi_list, list) { + list_for_each_entry(lne, napi_list, list) { + if (cne->napi_id == lne->napi_id) { + list_del(&lne->list); + kfree(lne); + break; + } + } + } + list_splice(napi_list, &ctx->napi_list); + spin_unlock(&ctx->napi_lock); +} +#endif + /* * Wait until events become available, if we don't already have some. The * application must reap them itself, as they reside on the shared cq ring. @@ -2388,6 +2592,9 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events, struct io_rings *rings = ctx->rings; ktime_t timeout = KTIME_MAX; int ret; +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL + LIST_HEAD(local_napi_list); +#endif if (!io_allowed_run_tw(ctx)) return -EEXIST; @@ -2416,13 +2623,34 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events, return ret; } +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL + iowq.busy_poll_to = 0; + if (!(ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL)) { + spin_lock(&ctx->napi_lock); + list_splice_init(&ctx->napi_list, &local_napi_list); + spin_unlock(&ctx->napi_lock); + } +#endif + if (uts) { struct timespec64 ts; if (get_timespec64(&ts, uts)) return -EFAULT; + +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL + if (!list_empty(&local_napi_list)) { + io_napi_adjust_busy_loop_timeout(READ_ONCE(ctx->napi_busy_poll_to), + &ts, &iowq.busy_poll_to); + } +#endif timeout = ktime_add_ns(timespec64_to_ktime(ts), ktime_get_ns()); } +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL + else if (!list_empty(&local_napi_list)) { + iowq.busy_poll_to = READ_ONCE(ctx->napi_busy_poll_to); + } +#endif init_waitqueue_func_entry(&iowq.wq, io_wake_function); iowq.wq.private = current; @@ -2432,6 +2660,15 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events, iowq.cq_tail = READ_ONCE(ctx->rings->cq.head) + min_events; trace_io_uring_cqring_wait(ctx, min_events); + +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL + if (iowq.busy_poll_to) + io_napi_blocking_busy_loop(&local_napi_list, &iowq); + + if (!list_empty(&local_napi_list)) + io_napi_putback_list(ctx, &local_napi_list); +#endif + do { /* if we can't even flush overflow, don't wait for more */ if (!io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx)) { @@ -2631,6 +2868,9 @@ static __cold void io_ring_ctx_free(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) io_req_caches_free(ctx); if (ctx->hash_map) io_wq_put_hash(ctx->hash_map); +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL + io_napi_free_list(ctx); +#endif kfree(ctx->cancel_table.hbs); kfree(ctx->cancel_table_locked.hbs); kfree(ctx->dummy_ubuf); diff --git a/io_uring/napi.h b/io_uring/napi.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..81ebaff07c68 --- /dev/null +++ b/io_uring/napi.h @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ + +#ifndef IOU_NAPI_H +#define IOU_NAPI_H + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/io_uring.h> +#include <net/busy_poll.h> + +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL + +void io_napi_add(struct file *file, struct io_ring_ctx *ctx); +bool io_napi_busy_loop(struct list_head *napi_list); + +#else + +static inline void io_napi_add(struct file *file, struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) +{ +} + +#endif +#endif diff --git a/io_uring/poll.c b/io_uring/poll.c index 0d9f49c575e0..38ed9f254075 100644 --- a/io_uring/poll.c +++ b/io_uring/poll.c @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include "io_uring.h" #include "refs.h" +#include "napi.h" #include "opdef.h" #include "kbuf.h" #include "poll.h" @@ -248,6 +249,7 @@ static int io_poll_check_events(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked) io_req_set_res(req, mask, 0); return IOU_POLL_REMOVE_POLL_USE_RES; } + io_napi_add(req->file, ctx); } else { ret = io_poll_issue(req, locked); if (ret == IOU_STOP_MULTISHOT) @@ -564,6 +566,7 @@ static int __io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req, __io_poll_execute(req, mask); return 0; } + io_napi_add(req->file, req->ctx); if (ipt->owning) { /* diff --git a/io_uring/sqpoll.c b/io_uring/sqpoll.c index 559652380672..8c0a1c09a9a6 100644 --- a/io_uring/sqpoll.c +++ b/io_uring/sqpoll.c @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include <uapi/linux/io_uring.h> #include "io_uring.h" +#include "napi.h" #include "sqpoll.h" #define IORING_SQPOLL_CAP_ENTRIES_VALUE 8 @@ -193,6 +194,14 @@ static int __io_sq_thread(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool cap_entries) ret = io_submit_sqes(ctx, to_submit); mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock); +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL + spin_lock(&ctx->napi_lock); + if (!list_empty(&ctx->napi_list) && + io_napi_busy_loop(&ctx->napi_list)) + ++ret; + spin_unlock(&ctx->napi_lock); +#endif + if (to_submit && wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->sqo_sq_wait)) wake_up(&ctx->sqo_sq_wait); if (creds) -- 2.30.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] io_uring: add napi busy polling support 2022-11-07 17:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] " Stefan Roesch @ 2022-11-07 18:33 ` Eric Dumazet 2022-11-07 19:08 ` Stefan Roesch 2022-11-09 0:56 ` Jakub Kicinski 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2022-11-07 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Roesch, kernel-team; +Cc: axboe, olivier, netdev, io-uring, kuba On 11/7/22 09:52, Stefan Roesch wrote: > This adds the napi busy polling support in io_uring.c. It adds a new > napi_list to the io_ring_ctx structure. This list contains the list of > napi_id's that are currently enabled for busy polling. The list is > synchronized by the new napi_lock spin lock. The current default napi > busy polling time is stored in napi_busy_poll_to. If napi busy polling > is not enabled, the value is 0. > > The busy poll timeout is also stored as part of the io_wait_queue. This > is necessary as for sq polling the poll interval needs to be adjusted > and the napi callback allows only to pass in one value. > > Testing has shown that the round-trip times are reduced to 38us from > 55us by enabling napi busy polling with a busy poll timeout of 100us. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]> > Suggested-by: Olivier Langlois <[email protected]> > --- > include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 6 + > io_uring/io_uring.c | 240 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > io_uring/napi.h | 22 +++ > io_uring/poll.c | 3 + > io_uring/sqpoll.c | 9 ++ > 5 files changed, 280 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 io_uring/napi.h > > diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h > index f5b687a787a3..84b446b0d215 100644 > --- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h > +++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h > @@ -270,6 +270,12 @@ struct io_ring_ctx { > struct xarray personalities; > u32 pers_next; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL > + struct list_head napi_list; /* track busy poll napi_id */ > + spinlock_t napi_lock; /* napi_list lock */ > + unsigned int napi_busy_poll_to; /* napi busy poll default timeout */ > +#endif > + > struct { > /* > * We cache a range of free CQEs we can use, once exhausted it > diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c > index ac8c488e3077..b02bba4ebcbf 100644 > --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c > +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c > @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ > #include "rsrc.h" > #include "cancel.h" > #include "net.h" > +#include "napi.h" > #include "notif.h" > > #include "timeout.h" > @@ -327,6 +328,13 @@ static __cold struct io_ring_ctx *io_ring_ctx_alloc(struct io_uring_params *p) > INIT_WQ_LIST(&ctx->locked_free_list); > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ctx->fallback_work, io_fallback_req_func); > INIT_WQ_LIST(&ctx->submit_state.compl_reqs); > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->napi_list); > + spin_lock_init(&ctx->napi_lock); > + ctx->napi_busy_poll_to = READ_ONCE(sysctl_net_busy_poll); > +#endif > + > return ctx; > err: > kfree(ctx->dummy_ubuf); > @@ -2303,6 +2311,10 @@ struct io_wait_queue { > struct io_ring_ctx *ctx; > unsigned cq_tail; > unsigned nr_timeouts; > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL > + unsigned int busy_poll_to; > +#endif > }; > > static inline bool io_has_work(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) > @@ -2376,6 +2388,198 @@ static inline int io_cqring_wait_schedule(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, > return 1; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL > +#define NAPI_TIMEOUT (60 * SEC_CONVERSION) > + > +struct io_napi_entry { > + struct list_head list; > + unsigned int napi_id; > + unsigned long timeout; > +}; > + > +static bool io_napi_busy_loop_on(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) > +{ > + return READ_ONCE(ctx->napi_busy_poll_to); > +} > + > +/* > + * io_napi_add() - Add napi id to the busy poll list > + * @file: file pointer for socket > + * @ctx: io-uring context > + * > + * Add the napi id of the socket to the napi busy poll list. > + */ > +void io_napi_add(struct file *file, struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) > +{ > + unsigned int napi_id; > + struct socket *sock; > + struct sock *sk; > + struct io_napi_entry *ne; > + > + if (!io_napi_busy_loop_on(ctx)) > + return; > + > + sock = sock_from_file(file); > + if (!sock) > + return; > + > + sk = sock->sk; > + if (!sk) > + return; > + > + napi_id = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_napi_id); > + > + /* Non-NAPI IDs can be rejected */ > + if (napi_id < MIN_NAPI_ID) > + return; > + > + spin_lock(&ctx->napi_lock); > + list_for_each_entry(ne, &ctx->napi_list, list) { > + if (ne->napi_id == napi_id) { > + ne->timeout = jiffies + NAPI_TIMEOUT; > + goto out; > + } This list could become very big, if you do not remove stale napi_id from it. Device reconfiguration do not recycle napi_id, it creates new ones. > + } > + > + ne = kmalloc(sizeof(*ne), GFP_NOWAIT); > + if (!ne) > + goto out; > + > + ne->napi_id = napi_id; > + ne->timeout = jiffies + NAPI_TIMEOUT; > + list_add_tail(&ne->list, &ctx->napi_list); > + > +out: > + spin_unlock(&ctx->napi_lock); > +} > + > + ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] io_uring: add napi busy polling support 2022-11-07 18:33 ` Eric Dumazet @ 2022-11-07 19:08 ` Stefan Roesch 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Stefan Roesch @ 2022-11-07 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Dumazet; +Cc: kernel-team, axboe, olivier, netdev, io-uring, kuba Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> writes: > On 11/7/22 09:52, Stefan Roesch wrote: >> This adds the napi busy polling support in io_uring.c. It adds a new >> napi_list to the io_ring_ctx structure. This list contains the list of >> napi_id's that are currently enabled for busy polling. The list is >> synchronized by the new napi_lock spin lock. The current default napi >> busy polling time is stored in napi_busy_poll_to. If napi busy polling >> is not enabled, the value is 0. >> >> The busy poll timeout is also stored as part of the io_wait_queue. This >> is necessary as for sq polling the poll interval needs to be adjusted >> and the napi callback allows only to pass in one value. >> >> Testing has shown that the round-trip times are reduced to 38us from >> 55us by enabling napi busy polling with a busy poll timeout of 100us. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]> >> Suggested-by: Olivier Langlois <[email protected]> >> --- >> include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 6 + >> io_uring/io_uring.c | 240 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> io_uring/napi.h | 22 +++ >> io_uring/poll.c | 3 + >> io_uring/sqpoll.c | 9 ++ >> 5 files changed, 280 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 io_uring/napi.h >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h >> index f5b687a787a3..84b446b0d215 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h >> +++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h >> @@ -270,6 +270,12 @@ struct io_ring_ctx { >> struct xarray personalities; >> u32 pers_next; >> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL >> + struct list_head napi_list; /* track busy poll napi_id */ >> + spinlock_t napi_lock; /* napi_list lock */ >> + unsigned int napi_busy_poll_to; /* napi busy poll default timeout */ >> +#endif >> + >> struct { >> /* >> * We cache a range of free CQEs we can use, once exhausted it >> diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c >> index ac8c488e3077..b02bba4ebcbf 100644 >> --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c >> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c >> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ >> #include "rsrc.h" >> #include "cancel.h" >> #include "net.h" >> +#include "napi.h" >> #include "notif.h" >> #include "timeout.h" >> @@ -327,6 +328,13 @@ static __cold struct io_ring_ctx *io_ring_ctx_alloc(struct io_uring_params *p) >> INIT_WQ_LIST(&ctx->locked_free_list); >> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ctx->fallback_work, io_fallback_req_func); >> INIT_WQ_LIST(&ctx->submit_state.compl_reqs); >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL >> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->napi_list); >> + spin_lock_init(&ctx->napi_lock); >> + ctx->napi_busy_poll_to = READ_ONCE(sysctl_net_busy_poll); >> +#endif >> + >> return ctx; >> err: >> kfree(ctx->dummy_ubuf); >> @@ -2303,6 +2311,10 @@ struct io_wait_queue { >> struct io_ring_ctx *ctx; >> unsigned cq_tail; >> unsigned nr_timeouts; >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL >> + unsigned int busy_poll_to; >> +#endif >> }; >> static inline bool io_has_work(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) >> @@ -2376,6 +2388,198 @@ static inline int io_cqring_wait_schedule(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, >> return 1; >> } >> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL >> +#define NAPI_TIMEOUT (60 * SEC_CONVERSION) >> + >> +struct io_napi_entry { >> + struct list_head list; >> + unsigned int napi_id; >> + unsigned long timeout; >> +}; >> + >> +static bool io_napi_busy_loop_on(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) >> +{ >> + return READ_ONCE(ctx->napi_busy_poll_to); >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * io_napi_add() - Add napi id to the busy poll list >> + * @file: file pointer for socket >> + * @ctx: io-uring context >> + * >> + * Add the napi id of the socket to the napi busy poll list. >> + */ >> +void io_napi_add(struct file *file, struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) >> +{ >> + unsigned int napi_id; >> + struct socket *sock; >> + struct sock *sk; >> + struct io_napi_entry *ne; >> + >> + if (!io_napi_busy_loop_on(ctx)) >> + return; >> + >> + sock = sock_from_file(file); >> + if (!sock) >> + return; >> + >> + sk = sock->sk; >> + if (!sk) >> + return; >> + >> + napi_id = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_napi_id); >> + >> + /* Non-NAPI IDs can be rejected */ >> + if (napi_id < MIN_NAPI_ID) >> + return; >> + >> + spin_lock(&ctx->napi_lock); >> + list_for_each_entry(ne, &ctx->napi_list, list) { >> + if (ne->napi_id == napi_id) { >> + ne->timeout = jiffies + NAPI_TIMEOUT; >> + goto out; >> + } > > This list could become very big, if you do not remove stale napi_id from it. > > Device reconfiguration do not recycle napi_id, it creates new ones. > > The timeout is specified by NAPI_TIMEOUT (which is likely too high). The timeout of an entry is checked in io_napi_check_entry_timeout and might get deleted if the timeout expired. This function is called from the busy loop functions. Are you referring to the fact that the timeout is too high or that device reconfiguration needs to make changes to the napi list. >> + } >> + >> + ne = kmalloc(sizeof(*ne), GFP_NOWAIT); >> + if (!ne) >> + goto out; >> + >> + ne->napi_id = napi_id; >> + ne->timeout = jiffies + NAPI_TIMEOUT; >> + list_add_tail(&ne->list, &ctx->napi_list); >> + >> +out: >> + spin_unlock(&ctx->napi_lock); >> +} >> + >> + ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] io_uring: add napi busy polling support 2022-11-07 17:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] " Stefan Roesch 2022-11-07 18:33 ` Eric Dumazet @ 2022-11-09 0:56 ` Jakub Kicinski 2022-11-10 23:36 ` Stefan Roesch 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2022-11-09 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Roesch; +Cc: kernel-team, axboe, olivier, netdev, io-uring On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 09:52:39 -0800 Stefan Roesch wrote: > This adds the napi busy polling support in io_uring.c. It adds a new > napi_list to the io_ring_ctx structure. This list contains the list of > napi_id's that are currently enabled for busy polling. The list is > synchronized by the new napi_lock spin lock. The current default napi > busy polling time is stored in napi_busy_poll_to. If napi busy polling > is not enabled, the value is 0. > > The busy poll timeout is also stored as part of the io_wait_queue. This > is necessary as for sq polling the poll interval needs to be adjusted > and the napi callback allows only to pass in one value. > > Testing has shown that the round-trip times are reduced to 38us from > 55us by enabling napi busy polling with a busy poll timeout of 100us. What's the test, exactly? What's the network latency? Did you busy poll on both ends? I reckon we should either find a real application or not include any numbers. Most of the quoted win likely comes from skipping IRQ coalescing. Which can just be set lowered if latency of 30usec is a win in itself.. Would it be possible to try to integrate this with Jonathan's WIP zero-copy work? I presume he has explicit NAPI/queue <> io_uring instance mapping which is exactly the kind of use case we should make a first-class citizen here. > + spin_lock(&ctx->napi_lock); > + list_for_each_entry(ne, &ctx->napi_list, list) { > + if (ne->napi_id == napi_id) { > + ne->timeout = jiffies + NAPI_TIMEOUT; What's the NAPI_TIMEOUT thing? I don't see it mentioned in the commit msg. > + list_for_each_entry_safe(ne, n, napi_list, list) { > + napi_busy_loop(ne->napi_id, NULL, NULL, true, BUSY_POLL_BUDGET); You can't opt the user into prefer busy poll without the user asking for it. Default to false and add an explicit knob like patch 2. > timeout = ktime_add_ns(timespec64_to_ktime(ts), ktime_get_ns()); > } > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL > + else if (!list_empty(&local_napi_list)) { > + iowq.busy_poll_to = READ_ONCE(ctx->napi_busy_poll_to); > + } > +#endif You don't have to break the normal bracket placement for an ifdef: if (something) { boring_code(); #ifdef CONFIG_WANT_CHEESE } else if (is_gouda) { /* mmm */ nom_nom(); #endif } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] io_uring: add napi busy polling support 2022-11-09 0:56 ` Jakub Kicinski @ 2022-11-10 23:36 ` Stefan Roesch 2022-11-11 1:35 ` Jakub Kicinski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Stefan Roesch @ 2022-11-10 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jakub Kicinski; +Cc: kernel-team, axboe, olivier, netdev, io-uring Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 09:52:39 -0800 Stefan Roesch wrote: >> This adds the napi busy polling support in io_uring.c. It adds a new >> napi_list to the io_ring_ctx structure. This list contains the list of >> napi_id's that are currently enabled for busy polling. The list is >> synchronized by the new napi_lock spin lock. The current default napi >> busy polling time is stored in napi_busy_poll_to. If napi busy polling >> is not enabled, the value is 0. >> >> The busy poll timeout is also stored as part of the io_wait_queue. This >> is necessary as for sq polling the poll interval needs to be adjusted >> and the napi callback allows only to pass in one value. >> >> Testing has shown that the round-trip times are reduced to 38us from >> 55us by enabling napi busy polling with a busy poll timeout of 100us. > > What's the test, exactly? What's the network latency? Did you busy poll > on both ends? > The test programs are part of the liburing patches. They consist of a client and server program. The client sends a request, which has a timestamp in its payload and the server replies with the same payload. The client calculates the roundtrip time and stores it to calcualte the results. The client is running on host1 and the server is running on host 2. The measured times below are roundtrip times. These are average times over 10 runs each. If no napi busy polling wait is used : 55us If napi with client busy polling is used : 44us If napi busy polling is used on the client and server: 38us If you think the numbers are not that useful, I can remove them from the commit message. > I reckon we should either find a real application or not include any > numbers. Most of the quoted win likely comes from skipping IRQ > coalescing. Which can just be set lowered if latency of 30usec is > a win in itself.. > > Would it be possible to try to integrate this with Jonathan's WIP > zero-copy work? I presume he has explicit NAPI/queue <> io_uring > instance mapping which is exactly the kind of use case we should > make a first-class citizen here. > I'll have a look at Jonathan's patches. >> + spin_lock(&ctx->napi_lock); >> + list_for_each_entry(ne, &ctx->napi_list, list) { >> + if (ne->napi_id == napi_id) { >> + ne->timeout = jiffies + NAPI_TIMEOUT; > > What's the NAPI_TIMEOUT thing? I don't see it mentioned in > the commit msg. > To make sure that the napi id's are cleaned up, they have a timeout. The function io_napi_check_entry_timeout checks if the timeout expired. This has been added to make sure the list does not grow without bound. >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(ne, n, napi_list, list) { >> + napi_busy_loop(ne->napi_id, NULL, NULL, true, BUSY_POLL_BUDGET); > > You can't opt the user into prefer busy poll without the user asking > for it. Default to false and add an explicit knob like patch 2. > The above code is from the function io_napi_blocking_busy_loop(). However this function is only called when a busy poll timeout has been configured. #ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL if (iowq.busy_poll_to) io_napi_blocking_busy_loop(&local_napi_list, &iowq); However we don't have that check for sqpoll, so we should add a check for the napi busy poll timeout in __io_sq_thread. Do we really need a knob to store if napi busy polling is enabled or is sufficent to store a napi busy poll timeout value? >> timeout = ktime_add_ns(timespec64_to_ktime(ts), ktime_get_ns()); >> } >> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL >> + else if (!list_empty(&local_napi_list)) { >> + iowq.busy_poll_to = READ_ONCE(ctx->napi_busy_poll_to); >> + } >> +#endif > > You don't have to break the normal bracket placement for an ifdef: > > if (something) { > boring_code(); > > #ifdef CONFIG_WANT_CHEESE > } else if (is_gouda) { > /* mmm */ > nom_nom(); > #endif > } I'll fix the above with the next version of the patch. ' ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] io_uring: add napi busy polling support 2022-11-10 23:36 ` Stefan Roesch @ 2022-11-11 1:35 ` Jakub Kicinski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2022-11-11 1:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Roesch; +Cc: kernel-team, axboe, olivier, netdev, io-uring On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 15:36:34 -0800 Stefan Roesch wrote: > Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> writes: > > On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 09:52:39 -0800 Stefan Roesch wrote: > >> This adds the napi busy polling support in io_uring.c. It adds a new > >> napi_list to the io_ring_ctx structure. This list contains the list of > >> napi_id's that are currently enabled for busy polling. The list is > >> synchronized by the new napi_lock spin lock. The current default napi > >> busy polling time is stored in napi_busy_poll_to. If napi busy polling > >> is not enabled, the value is 0. > >> > >> The busy poll timeout is also stored as part of the io_wait_queue. This > >> is necessary as for sq polling the poll interval needs to be adjusted > >> and the napi callback allows only to pass in one value. > >> > >> Testing has shown that the round-trip times are reduced to 38us from > >> 55us by enabling napi busy polling with a busy poll timeout of 100us. > > > > What's the test, exactly? What's the network latency? Did you busy poll > > on both ends? > > The test programs are part of the liburing patches. They consist of a > client and server program. The client sends a request, which has a timestamp > in its payload and the server replies with the same payload. The client > calculates the roundtrip time and stores it to calcualte the results. > > The client is running on host1 and the server is running on host 2. The > measured times below are roundtrip times. These are average times over > 10 runs each. > > If no napi busy polling wait is used : 55us > If napi with client busy polling is used : 44us > If napi busy polling is used on the client and server: 38us > > If you think the numbers are not that useful, I can remove them from the > commit message. The latency numbers are a sum of a few components so you'd need to break them down a little further. At least for me. I'd anticipate we'll have networking delay, IRQ/completion coalescing in the NIC, and then SW processing time. I was suspecting you were only busy polling on one end, because the 38us is very close to the default IRQ coalescing "we" have (33us). Simplest way to provide a clear number would be to test with IRQ coal set to 0/1, and back-to-back machines (or within a rack). If that's what you did then just add the info to the msg and the numbers are good :) > >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(ne, n, napi_list, list) { > >> + napi_busy_loop(ne->napi_id, NULL, NULL, true, BUSY_POLL_BUDGET); > > > > You can't opt the user into prefer busy poll without the user asking > > for it. Default to false and add an explicit knob like patch 2. > > > > The above code is from the function io_napi_blocking_busy_loop(). > However this function is only called when a busy poll timeout has been > configured. > > #ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL > if (iowq.busy_poll_to) > io_napi_blocking_busy_loop(&local_napi_list, &iowq); > > However we don't have that check for sqpoll, so we should add a check > for the napi busy poll timeout in __io_sq_thread. > > Do we really need a knob to store if napi busy polling is enabled or is > sufficent to store a napi busy poll timeout value? I was asking about *prefer* busy poll, IOW SO_PREFER_BUSY_POLL. So I'm talking about argument 4 being set to true. This feature requires system configuration to arm timers to the correct values within the netdev code. Normal epoll path always passes false there, IIRC. We can add the support in iouring but we need an opt-in. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] io_uring: add api to set napi busy poll timeout. 2022-11-07 17:52 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] io_uring: add napi busy polling support Stefan Roesch 2022-11-07 17:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] " Stefan Roesch @ 2022-11-07 17:52 ` Stefan Roesch 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Stefan Roesch @ 2022-11-07 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernel-team; +Cc: shr, axboe, olivier, netdev, io-uring, kuba This adds an api to register and unregister the busy poll timeout from liburing. To be able to use this functionality, the corresponding liburing patch is needed. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]> --- include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 4 ++++ io_uring/io_uring.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h index ab7458033ee3..48670074e1fc 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h @@ -490,6 +490,10 @@ enum { /* register a range of fixed file slots for automatic slot allocation */ IORING_REGISTER_FILE_ALLOC_RANGE = 25, + /* set/clear busy poll timeout */ + IORING_REGISTER_NAPI_BUSY_POLL_TIMEOUT = 26, + IORING_UNREGISTER_NAPI_BUSY_POLL_TIMEOUT= 27, + /* this goes last */ IORING_REGISTER_LAST }; diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c index b02bba4ebcbf..b685af668641 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c @@ -4111,6 +4111,16 @@ static __cold int io_register_iowq_max_workers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, return ret; } +static int io_register_napi_busy_poll_timeout(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int to) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL + WRITE_ONCE(ctx->napi_busy_poll_to, to); + return 0; +#else + return -EINVAL; +#endif +} + static int __io_uring_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned opcode, void __user *arg, unsigned nr_args) __releases(ctx->uring_lock) @@ -4271,6 +4281,18 @@ static int __io_uring_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned opcode, break; ret = io_register_file_alloc_range(ctx, arg); break; + case IORING_REGISTER_NAPI_BUSY_POLL_TIMEOUT: + ret = -EINVAL; + if (arg || !nr_args) + break; + ret = io_register_napi_busy_poll_timeout(ctx, nr_args); + break; + case IORING_UNREGISTER_NAPI_BUSY_POLL_TIMEOUT: + ret = -EINVAL; + if (arg || nr_args) + break; + ret = io_register_napi_busy_poll_timeout(ctx, nr_args); + break; default: ret = -EINVAL; break; -- 2.30.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-11 1:35 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-11-07 17:52 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] io_uring: add napi busy polling support Stefan Roesch 2022-11-07 17:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] " Stefan Roesch 2022-11-07 18:33 ` Eric Dumazet 2022-11-07 19:08 ` Stefan Roesch 2022-11-09 0:56 ` Jakub Kicinski 2022-11-10 23:36 ` Stefan Roesch 2022-11-11 1:35 ` Jakub Kicinski 2022-11-07 17:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] io_uring: add api to set napi busy poll timeout Stefan Roesch
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox