From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH v2 13/13] io_uring/io-wq: return 2-step work swap scheme
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:52:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <014eff28b71c8e5da5edaa4ad9d142916317c839.1612446019.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Saving one lock/unlock for io-wq is not super important, but adds some
ugliness in the code. More important, atomic decs not turning it to zero
for some archs won't give the right ordering/barriers so the
io_steal_work() may pretty easily get subtly and completely broken.
Return back 2-step io-wq work exchange and clean it up.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io-wq.c | 16 ++++++----------
fs/io-wq.h | 4 ++--
fs/io_uring.c | 26 ++++----------------------
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index 2e2f14f42bf2..63ef195b1acb 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -555,23 +555,21 @@ static void io_worker_handle_work(struct io_worker *worker)
/* handle a whole dependent link */
do {
- struct io_wq_work *old_work, *next_hashed, *linked;
+ struct io_wq_work *next_hashed, *linked;
unsigned int hash = io_get_work_hash(work);
next_hashed = wq_next_work(work);
io_impersonate_work(worker, work);
+ wq->do_work(work);
+ io_assign_current_work(worker, NULL);
- old_work = work;
- linked = wq->do_work(work);
-
+ linked = wq->free_work(work);
work = next_hashed;
if (!work && linked && !io_wq_is_hashed(linked)) {
work = linked;
linked = NULL;
}
io_assign_current_work(worker, work);
- wq->free_work(old_work);
-
if (linked)
io_wqe_enqueue(wqe, linked);
@@ -850,11 +848,9 @@ static void io_run_cancel(struct io_wq_work *work, struct io_wqe *wqe)
struct io_wq *wq = wqe->wq;
do {
- struct io_wq_work *old_work = work;
-
work->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL;
- work = wq->do_work(work);
- wq->free_work(old_work);
+ wq->do_work(work);
+ work = wq->free_work(work);
} while (work);
}
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.h b/fs/io-wq.h
index e1ffb80a4a1d..e37a0f217cc8 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.h
+++ b/fs/io-wq.h
@@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ static inline struct io_wq_work *wq_next_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
return container_of(work->list.next, struct io_wq_work, list);
}
-typedef void (free_work_fn)(struct io_wq_work *);
-typedef struct io_wq_work *(io_wq_work_fn)(struct io_wq_work *);
+typedef struct io_wq_work *(free_work_fn)(struct io_wq_work *);
+typedef void (io_wq_work_fn)(struct io_wq_work *);
struct io_wq_data {
struct user_struct *user;
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 5ee6a9273fca..b740a39110d6 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -2379,22 +2379,6 @@ static inline void io_put_req_deferred(struct io_kiocb *req, int refs)
io_free_req_deferred(req);
}
-static struct io_wq_work *io_steal_work(struct io_kiocb *req)
-{
- struct io_kiocb *nxt;
-
- /*
- * A ref is owned by io-wq in which context we're. So, if that's the
- * last one, it's safe to steal next work. False negatives are Ok,
- * it just will be re-punted async in io_put_work()
- */
- if (refcount_read(&req->refs) != 1)
- return NULL;
-
- nxt = io_req_find_next(req);
- return nxt ? &nxt->work : NULL;
-}
-
static void io_double_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
/* drop both submit and complete references */
@@ -6343,7 +6327,7 @@ static int io_issue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
return 0;
}
-static struct io_wq_work *io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
+static void io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
{
struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(work, struct io_kiocb, work);
struct io_kiocb *timeout;
@@ -6394,8 +6378,6 @@ static struct io_wq_work *io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
if (lock_ctx)
mutex_unlock(&lock_ctx->uring_lock);
}
-
- return io_steal_work(req);
}
static inline struct file *io_file_from_index(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
@@ -8067,12 +8049,12 @@ static int io_sqe_files_update(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
return __io_sqe_files_update(ctx, &up, nr_args);
}
-static void io_free_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
+static struct io_wq_work *io_free_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
{
struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(work, struct io_kiocb, work);
- /* Consider that io_steal_work() relies on this ref */
- io_put_req(req);
+ req = io_put_req_find_next(req);
+ return req ? &req->work : NULL;
}
static int io_init_wq_offload(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
--
2.24.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-04 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-04 13:51 [PATCH v2 5.12 00/13] a second pack of 5.12 cleanups Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] io_uring: deduplicate core cancellations sequence Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] io_uring: refactor scheduling in io_cqring_wait Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] io_uring: refactor io_cqring_wait Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] io_uring: refactor io_read for unsupported nowait Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 13:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] io_uring: further simplify do_read error parsing Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 13:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] io_uring: let io_setup_async_rw take care of iovec Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 13:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] io_uring: don't forget to adjust io_size Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 13:52 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] io_uring: inline io_read()'s iovec freeing Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 13:52 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] io_uring: highlight read-retry loop Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 13:52 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] io_uring: treat NONBLOCK and RWF_NOWAIT similarly Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 13:52 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] io_uring: io_import_iovec return type cleanup Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 13:52 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] io_uring: deduplicate file table slot calculation Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 13:52 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-02-04 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] io_uring/io-wq: return 2-step work swap scheme Jens Axboe
2021-02-04 14:56 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 15:05 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-04 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 5.12 00/13] a second pack of 5.12 cleanups Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=014eff28b71c8e5da5edaa4ad9d142916317c839.1612446019.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox