From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52386C433E0 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 13:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C00E20772 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 13:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="mk1qLE9t" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726382AbgF1Nts (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jun 2020 09:49:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53688 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726344AbgF1Nts (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jun 2020 09:49:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x544.google.com (mail-pg1-x544.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::544]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37430C061794 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 06:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x544.google.com with SMTP id p3so7114960pgh.3 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 06:49:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mGV7CCXsMX/PFRGvdiVi33g++r1N5t8SlQHxMelPFUY=; b=mk1qLE9tFbHJKwsLBn+DnetI/3qPF3fL4qUDDUJ2KJfGC85s8AomEy66ILhVNeXHjO cVIIYanzXY7eHfAA8RveH5NjHTUYQj+UWwsS9iZERMR0uP7LZ5jMqhk91YtfDn4sdjBW HEl0HtY816SpkhRaS6FWSGcb9AVSnl/HwqQ2K98nR2svPt5XOLCySEN9hoXLxE9MqnSH MRdhLvZ+GfK2jW9jfQyNtf7sdW4QwiQIM5hNYPWQnxfkV6SSr+Wn1oBr9/sjpxkiMGiZ 2LZSi3QO+PZ7vH4JPa05ewPRsUXqPcxmXFBmOpspT5UubaRnAoYf6s2GdWP+lXi6rRkP VjDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mGV7CCXsMX/PFRGvdiVi33g++r1N5t8SlQHxMelPFUY=; b=cvFATasyZk3pbXhdw03PwhhceuZLIxtmN3ipzCV+LxYsEZBzaOB6DhmgQi33IE6Ond j5zr4QpjkTO1Q2xTCey4xGeA51a1lxWgD2SHZG46OLVrt3de0xAPNtERROiHp0Zhx46n EJJ2PBBiLWc2UfQXYxoWmKHq4zIxT7HhxaRl+St8CWRHz+n01OXSAPgeMI9k78qkRasu GLAFk1m6F2ENUAE6VrrPmyl/Mmodl3j6voenQk6f9mrGbrWFj67aap7qKgZHwl9fRIWF rlohpAugJXLHq/UugNW0LEr2oF+MwC4MGOzJIxkcHZ5uZTEDgBx/zeS9FZ9gb4OE4lwQ 29mQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5336tOjgykmj/9i4YGoH+VKLM1DCn+Gqcbgjb6ql08DsfsOAB0Xs vlPTX3SED1W0QS2LXK8ZOm1Ajj/BD/4oBA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBAGMZNPxrizpWoZz3bDm5gVpDn090bAg0oOpMcb0GKzCDaX24RLyO2PUgeESnVCXYRdWGsQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:4e51:: with SMTP id o17mr6849777pgl.315.1593352187313; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 06:49:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.86.197] (cpe-75-85-219-51.dc.res.rr.com. [75.85.219.51]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r17sm4360520pfg.62.2020.06.28.06.49.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 28 Jun 2020 06:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] "task_work for links" fixes To: Pavel Begunkov , io-uring@vger.kernel.org References: From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <05084aea-c517-4bcf-1e87-5a26033ba8eb@kernel.dk> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 07:49:45 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: io-uring-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 6/27/20 5:04 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > All but [3/5] are different segfault fixes for > c40f63790ec9 ("io_uring: use task_work for links if possible") Looks reasonable, too bad about the task_work moving out of the union, but I agree there's no other nice way to avoid this. BTW, fwiw, I've moved that to the head of the series. -- Jens Axboe