From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Hao Xu <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: fix io_rsrc_ref_quiesce races
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 14:07:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 20/02/2021 06:31, Hao Xu wrote:
> 在 2021/2/20 上午4:45, Pavel Begunkov 写道:
>> There are different types of races in io_rsrc_ref_quiesce() between
>> ->release() of percpu_refs and reinit_completion(), fix them by always
>> resurrecting between iterations. BTW, clean the function up, because
>> DRY.
>>
>> Fixes: 0ce4a72632317 ("io_uring: don't hold uring_lock when calling io_run_task_work*")
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> fs/io_uring.c | 46 +++++++++++++---------------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>> index 50d4dba08f82..38ed52065a29 100644
>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>> @@ -7316,19 +7316,6 @@ static void io_sqe_rsrc_set_node(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>> percpu_ref_get(&rsrc_data->refs);
>> }
>> -static int io_sqe_rsrc_add_node(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct fixed_rsrc_data *data)
>> -{
>> - struct fixed_rsrc_ref_node *backup_node;
>> -
>> - backup_node = alloc_fixed_rsrc_ref_node(ctx);
>> - if (!backup_node)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> - init_fixed_file_ref_node(ctx, backup_node);
>> - io_sqe_rsrc_set_node(ctx, data, backup_node);
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> static void io_sqe_rsrc_kill_node(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct fixed_rsrc_data *data)
>> {
>> struct fixed_rsrc_ref_node *ref_node = NULL;
>> @@ -7347,36 +7334,29 @@ static int io_rsrc_ref_quiesce(struct fixed_rsrc_data *data,
>> {
>> int ret;
>> - io_sqe_rsrc_kill_node(ctx, data);
>> - percpu_ref_kill(&data->refs);
>> -
>> - /* wait for all refs nodes to complete */
>> - flush_delayed_work(&ctx->rsrc_put_work);
>> do {
>> + io_sqe_rsrc_kill_node(ctx, data);
>> + percpu_ref_kill(&data->refs);
>> + flush_delayed_work(&ctx->rsrc_put_work);
>> +
>> ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&data->done);
>> if (!ret)
>> break;
>> - ret = io_sqe_rsrc_add_node(ctx, data);
>> - if (ret < 0)
>> - break;
>> - /*
>> - * There is small possibility that data->done is already completed
>> - * So reinit it here
>> - */
>> + percpu_ref_resurrect(&data->refs);
> I've thought about this, if we resurrect data->refs, then we can't
> avoid parallel files unregister by percpu_refs_is_dying.
Right, totally forgot about it, but otherwise we race with data->done.
Didn't test yet, but a diff below should do the trick.
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> + backup_node = alloc_fixed_rsrc_ref_node(ctx);
>> + if (!backup_node)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
> Should we resurrect data->refs and reinit completion before
> signal or error return?
Not sure what exactly you mean, we should not release uring_lock with
inconsistent state, so it's done right before unlock. And we should not
do it before wait_for_completion_interruptible() before it would take a
reference.
>> + init_fixed_file_ref_node(ctx, backup_node);
>> + } while (1);
>> destroy_fixed_rsrc_ref_node(backup_node);
>> return 0;
>>
>
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index ce5fccf00367..0af1572634de 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ struct fixed_rsrc_data {
struct fixed_rsrc_ref_node *node;
struct percpu_ref refs;
struct completion done;
+ bool quiesce;
};
struct io_buffer {
@@ -7335,6 +7336,7 @@ static int io_rsrc_ref_quiesce(struct fixed_rsrc_data *data,
struct fixed_rsrc_ref_node *backup_node;
int ret;
+ data->quiesce = true;
do {
backup_node = alloc_fixed_rsrc_ref_node(ctx);
if (!backup_node)
@@ -7353,16 +7355,19 @@ static int io_rsrc_ref_quiesce(struct fixed_rsrc_data *data,
percpu_ref_resurrect(&data->refs);
synchronize_rcu();
io_sqe_rsrc_set_node(ctx, data, backup_node);
+ backup_node = NULL;
reinit_completion(&data->done);
mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
ret = io_run_task_work_sig();
mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- } while (1);
+ } while (ret >= 0);
- destroy_fixed_rsrc_ref_node(backup_node);
- return 0;
+ data->quiesce = false;
+ if (backup_node)
+ destroy_fixed_rsrc_ref_node(backup_node);
+ return ret;
}
static struct fixed_rsrc_data *alloc_fixed_rsrc_data(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
@@ -7401,7 +7406,7 @@ static int io_sqe_files_unregister(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
* Since we possibly drop uring lock later in this function to
* run task work.
*/
- if (!data || percpu_ref_is_dying(&data->refs))
+ if (!data || data->quiesce)
return -ENXIO;
ret = io_rsrc_ref_quiesce(data, ctx, io_ring_file_put);
if (ret)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-20 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-19 20:45 [PATCH 0/3] rsrc quiesce fixes/hardening Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-19 20:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: zero ref_node after killing it Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-19 20:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: fix io_rsrc_ref_quiesce races Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-20 6:31 ` Hao Xu
2021-02-20 14:07 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-02-20 14:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-21 9:46 ` Hao Xu
2021-02-19 20:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: keep generic rsrc infra generic Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-19 20:49 ` [PATCH 0/3] rsrc quiesce fixes/hardening Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-20 6:32 ` Hao Xu
2021-02-20 14:14 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-20 0:28 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox