From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Daniele Di Proietto <daniele.di.proietto@gmail.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: Add IORING_OP_DUP
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 11:30:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <086190ca-1c34-448f-a565-aa41f671971f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAExiqTKBFeyxE4nwSxd3muOuZkP5YDSoweYwns4wb64w8efPVQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/10/26 18:42, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 4:24 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/10/26 9:49 AM, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
>>> The new operation is like dup3(). The source file can be a regular file
>>> descriptor or a direct descriptor. The destination is a regular file
>>> descriptor.
>>>
>>> The direct descriptor variant is useful to move a descriptor to an fd
>>> and close the existing fd with a single acquisition of the `struct
>>> files_struct` `file_lock`. Combined with IORING_OP_ACCEPT or
>>> IORING_OP_OPENAT2 with direct descriptors, it can reduce lock contention
>>> for multithreaded applications.
>>
>> Overall comment - how does this interact with direct descriptors? Feels
>> like this should support both, rather than just normal file descriptors.
>
> As implemented, the operation supports:
> 1. src: direct, dst: normal (this is the use case I mostly care about)
> 2. src: normal, dst: normal ()
>
> I can extend it to also support
> 3. src: direct, dst: direct
> 4, src: normal, dst: direct
>
> I can use IOSQE_FIXED_FILE to pick the source and I guess I can use a
> bit in dup_flags (something like IORING_DUP_DIRECT) to decide whether
> the destination is a direct descriptor or normal.
>
> Does that make sense?
Let's not try to reuse IOSQE_FIXED_FILE for that. We may want to
operate with io_uring's filetable entries and not just files you get
from there. Two separate IORING_DUP_* flags should be better. And
you can extract a helper function out of
io_uring/splice.c::io_splice_get_file()
It might also be better to make it a part of IORING_OP_FILES_UPDATE
instead of wasting another opcode, and liburing can provide a
prep_dup helper for convenience.
--
Pavel Begunkov
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 15:49 [PATCH] io_uring: Add IORING_OP_DUP Daniele Di Proietto
2026-03-10 16:14 ` Keith Busch
2026-03-10 18:42 ` Daniele Di Proietto
2026-03-10 16:24 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-10 18:42 ` Daniele Di Proietto
2026-03-11 11:30 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=086190ca-1c34-448f-a565-aa41f671971f@gmail.com \
--to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=daniele.di.proietto@gmail.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox