From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] io_uring: expand main struct io_kiocb flags to 64-bits
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 13:22:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 2/8/24 1:08 PM, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Jens Axboe <[email protected]> writes:
>
>
>> - TP_printk("ring %p, request %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, flags 0x%x, %s queue, work %p",
>> + TP_printk("ring %p, request %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, flags 0x%lx, %s queue, work %p",
>> __entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->user_data,
>> - __get_str(op_str),
>> - __entry->flags, __entry->rw ? "hashed" : "normal", __entry->work)
>> + __get_str(op_str), (long) __entry->flags,
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> Minor, but on 32-bit kernel the cast is wrong since
> sizeof(long)==4. Afaik, io_uring still builds on 32-bit archs.
>
> If you use (unsigned long long), it will be 64 bit anywhere.
Ah thanks, I'll make that edit.
>> @@ -2171,7 +2171,8 @@ static int io_init_req(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
>> /* req is partially pre-initialised, see io_preinit_req() */
>> req->opcode = opcode = READ_ONCE(sqe->opcode);
>> /* same numerical values with corresponding REQ_F_*, safe to copy */
>> - req->flags = sqe_flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->flags);
>> + sqe_flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->flags);
>
> Did you consider that READ_ONCE won't protect from load tearing the
> userspace value in 32-bit architectures? It builds silently, though, and
> I suspect it is mostly fine in the current code, but might become a bug
> eventually.
sqe->flags is just a byte, so no tearing is possible here. The only
thing that changed type is req->flags.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-08 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-07 17:17 [PATCHSET v2 0/6] Misc cleanups / optimizations Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 17:17 ` [PATCH 1/6] io_uring: expand main struct io_kiocb flags to 64-bits Jens Axboe
2024-02-08 20:08 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-02-08 20:22 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-02-08 20:52 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-02-07 17:17 ` [PATCH 2/6] io_uring/cancel: don't default to setting req->work.cancel_seq Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 17:17 ` [PATCH 3/6] io_uring: add io_file_can_poll() helper Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 17:17 ` [PATCH 4/6] io_uring: mark the need to lock/unlock the ring as unlikely Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 17:17 ` [PATCH 5/6] io_uring: cleanup io_req_complete_post() Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 17:17 ` [PATCH 6/6] io_uring/rw: remove dead file == NULL check Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-06 16:22 [PATCHSET next 0/6] Misc cleanups / optimizations Jens Axboe
2024-02-06 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] io_uring: expand main struct io_kiocb flags to 64-bits Jens Axboe
2024-02-06 22:58 ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 0:43 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-02-07 2:18 ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-07 3:22 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox