From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]>
Cc: Necip Fazil Yildiran <[email protected]>,
[email protected], Hristo Venev <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix sq array offset calculation
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 09:36:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+YGwr+1k=rsJhMsnyQL4C+S2s9t7Cz5Axwc9fO5Ap4HbQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/11/20 9:31 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 5:16 PM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/11/20 3:31 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>> rings_size() sets sq_offset to the total size of the rings
>>> (the returned value which is used for memory allocation).
>>> This is wrong: sq array should be located within the rings,
>>> not after them. Set sq_offset to where it should be.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Cc: Hristo Venev <[email protected]>
>>> Fixes: 75b28affdd6a ("io_uring: allocate the two rings together")
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This looks so wrong and yet io_uring works.
>>> So I am either missing something very obvious here,
>>> or io_uring worked only due to lucky side-effects
>>> of rounding size to power-of-2 number of pages
>>> (which gave it enough slack at the end),
>>> maybe reading/writing some unrelated memory
>>> with some sizes.
>>> If I am wrong, please poke my nose into what I am not seeing.
>>> Otherwise, we probably need to CC stable as well.
>>
>> Well that's a noodle scratcher, it's definitely been working fine,
>> and I've never seen any out-of-bounds on any of the testing I do.
>> I regularly run anything with KASAN enabled too.
>
> Looking at the code more, I am not sure how it may not corrupt memory.
> There definitely should be some combinations where accessing
> sq_entries*sizeof(u32) more memory won't be OK.
> May be worth adding a test that allocates all possible sizes for sq/cq
> and fills both rings.
Yeah, actually doing that right now just to verify it.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-11 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-11 9:31 [PATCH] io_uring: fix sq array offset calculation Dmitry Vyukov
2020-07-11 9:37 ` Hristo Venev
2020-07-11 15:15 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-11 15:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-07-11 15:36 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-07-11 15:47 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-11 15:52 ` Hristo Venev
2020-07-11 15:55 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-11 15:56 ` Hristo Venev
2020-07-11 16:16 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-07-17 13:48 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-07-17 14:05 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-17 14:08 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-17 14:08 ` Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox