public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RFC][BUG] io_uring: fix work corruption for poll_add
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:24:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 7/23/20 4:16 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 7/23/20 12:12 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> poll_add can have req->work initialised, which will be overwritten in
>> __io_arm_poll_handler() because of the union. Luckily, hash_node is
>> zeroed in the end, so the damage is limited to lost put for work.creds,
>> and probably corrupted work.list.
>>
>> That's the easiest and really dirty fix, which rearranges members in the
>> union, arm_poll*() modifies and zeroes only work.files and work.mm,
>> which are never taken for poll add.
>> note: io_kiocb is exactly 4 cachelines now.
> 
> I don't think there's a way around moving task_work out, just like it
> was done on 5.9. The problem is that we could put the environment bits
> before doing task_work_add(), but we might need them if the subsequent
> queue ends up having to go async. So there's really no know when we can
> put them, outside of when the request finishes. Hence, we are kind of
> SOL here.

Actually, if we do go async, then we can just grab the environment
again. We're in the same task at that point. So maybe it'd be better to
work on ensuring that the request is either in the valid work state, or
empty work if using task_work.

Only potential complication with that is doing io_req_work_drop_env()
from the waitqueue handler, at least the ->needs_fs part won't like that
too much.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-23 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-23 18:12 [RFC][BUG] io_uring: fix work corruption for poll_add Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-23 18:15 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-23 18:19   ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-23 19:10     ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-23 22:16 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-23 22:24   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-07-24 12:46     ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-24 12:52       ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-24 14:12         ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-24 14:23           ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox