From: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <[email protected]>,
Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v9 04/14] iomap: Add flags parameter to iomap_page_create()
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 09:29:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZAIl7JfPXivtN8qm@magnolia>
On 3/3/23 8:53 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> >
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 04:51:10AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 10:51:47AM -0700, Stefan Roesch wrote:
>>> Add the kiocb flags parameter to the function iomap_page_create().
>>> Depending on the value of the flags parameter it enables different gfp
>>> flags.
>>>
>>> No intended functional changes in this patch.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> @@ -226,7 +234,7 @@ static int iomap_read_inline_data(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
>>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(size > iomap->length))
>>> return -EIO;
>>> if (offset > 0)
>>> - iop = iomap_page_create(iter->inode, folio);
>>> + iop = iomap_page_create(iter->inode, folio, iter->flags);
>>> else
>>> iop = to_iomap_page(folio);
>>
>> I really don't like what this change has done to this file. I'm
>> modifying this function, and I start thinking "Well, hang on, if
>> flags has IOMAP_NOWAIT set, then GFP_NOWAIT can fail, and iop
>> will be NULL, so we'll end up marking the entire folio uptodate
>> when really we should only be marking some blocks uptodate, so
>> we should really be failing the entire read if the allocation
>> failed, but maybe it's OK because IOMAP_NOWAIT is never set in
>> this path".
>>
>> I don't know how we fix this. Maybe return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) or
>> -EAGAIN if the memory allocation fails (leaving the NULL return
>> for "we don't need an iop"). Thoughts?
>
> I don't see any problem with that, aside from being pre-coffee and on
> vacation for the rest of today. ;)
>
> --D
If IOMAP_NOWAIT is set, and the allocation fails, we should return
-EAGAIN, so the write request is retried in the slow path.
--Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-03 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-23 17:51 [RESEND PATCH v9 00/14] io-uring/xfs: support async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-06-23 17:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v9 01/14] mm: Move starting of background writeback into the main balancing loop Stefan Roesch
2022-06-23 17:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v9 02/14] mm: Move updates of dirty_exceeded into one place Stefan Roesch
2022-06-23 17:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v9 03/14] mm: Add balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_flags() function Stefan Roesch
2022-06-23 17:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v9 05/14] iomap: Add async buffered write support Stefan Roesch
2022-06-23 17:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v9 06/14] iomap: Return -EAGAIN from iomap_write_iter() Stefan Roesch
2022-06-23 20:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-23 20:23 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-06-23 20:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-24 5:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-23 17:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v9 09/14] fs: Split off inode_needs_update_time and __file_update_time Stefan Roesch
2022-06-23 17:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v9 11/14] io_uring: Add support for async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-06-23 17:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v9 12/14] io_uring: Add tracepoint for short writes Stefan Roesch
2022-06-23 17:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v9 14/14] xfs: Add async buffered write support Stefan Roesch
2022-06-23 20:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v9 00/14] io-uring/xfs: support async buffered writes Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-23 22:06 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-24 5:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-24 14:49 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-24 15:27 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-06-24 15:29 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2022-06-24 5:21 ` [RESEND PATCH v9 07/14] fs: Add check for async buffered writes to generic_write_checks Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-24 14:48 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-24 17:06 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-25 12:48 ` (subset) [RESEND PATCH v9 00/14] io-uring/xfs: support async buffered writes Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2023-03-03 4:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v9 04/14] iomap: Add flags parameter to iomap_page_create() Matthew Wilcox
2023-03-03 16:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-03-03 17:29 ` Stefan Roesch [this message]
2023-03-06 13:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox