public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	"David S . Miller" <[email protected]>,
	Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>,
	David Ahern <[email protected]>,
	Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>,
	Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]>,
	Jason Wang <[email protected]>, Wei Liu <[email protected]>,
	Paul Durrant <[email protected]>,
	[email protected],
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH io_uring-next/net-next v2 0/4] implement io_uring notification (ubuf_info) stacking
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 12:21:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 4/19/24 12:08, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Please, don't take directly, conflicts with io_uring.

When everyone is happy with the patches, Jens and Jakub will hopefully
help to merge them. E.g. first staging net/ specific changes [1] and then
handling all conflicts on the io_uring side.

[1] https://github.com/isilence/linux.git iou-sendzc/notif-stacking-v2-netonly


> To have per request buffer notifications each zerocopy io_uring send
> request allocates a new ubuf_info. However, as an skb can carry only
> one uarg, it may force the stack to create many small skbs hurting
> performance in many ways.
> 
> The patchset implements notification, i.e. an io_uring's ubuf_info
> extension, stacking. It attempts to link ubuf_info's into a list,
> allowing to have multiple of them per skb.
> 
> liburing/examples/send-zerocopy shows up 6 times performance improvement
> for TCP with 4KB bytes per send, and levels it with MSG_ZEROCOPY. Without
> the patchset it requires much larger sends to utilise all potential.
> 
> bytes  | before | after (Kqps)
> 1200   | 195    | 1023
> 4000   | 193    | 1386
> 8000   | 154    | 1058
> 
> The patches are on top of net-next + io_uring-next:
> 
> https://github.com/isilence/linux.git iou-sendzc/notif-stacking-v2
> 
> First two patches based on net-next:
> 
> https://github.com/isilence/linux.git iou-sendzc/notif-stacking-v2-netonly
> 
> v2: convert xen-netback to ubuf_info_ops (patch 1)
>      drop two separately merged io_uring patches
> 
> Pavel Begunkov (4):
>    net: extend ubuf_info callback to ops structure
>    net: add callback for setting a ubuf_info to skb
>    io_uring/notif: simplify io_notif_flush()
>    io_uring/notif: implement notification stacking
> 
>   drivers/net/tap.c                   |  2 +-
>   drivers/net/tun.c                   |  2 +-
>   drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h    |  5 +-
>   drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c |  2 +-
>   drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c   | 11 ++--
>   drivers/vhost/net.c                 |  8 ++-
>   include/linux/skbuff.h              | 21 +++++---
>   io_uring/notif.c                    | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   io_uring/notif.h                    | 12 ++---
>   net/core/skbuff.c                   | 36 ++++++++-----
>   10 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-19 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-19 11:08 [PATCH io_uring-next/net-next v2 0/4] implement io_uring notification (ubuf_info) stacking Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-19 11:08 ` [PATCH io_uring-next/net-next v2 1/4] net: extend ubuf_info callback to ops structure Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-22 16:59   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-04-19 11:08 ` [PATCH io_uring-next/net-next v2 2/4] net: add callback for setting a ubuf_info to skb Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-22 17:01   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-04-19 11:08 ` [PATCH io_uring-next/net-next v2 3/4] io_uring/notif: simplify io_notif_flush() Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-19 11:08 ` [PATCH io_uring-next/net-next v2 4/4] io_uring/notif: implement notification stacking Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-19 11:21 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2024-04-23  0:20 ` [PATCH io_uring-next/net-next v2 0/4] implement io_uring notification (ubuf_info) stacking patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-04-23  1:36 ` (subset) " Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox