From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3781C54EBE for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 14:51:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230082AbjAIOvf (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 09:51:35 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41242 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234615AbjAIOvP (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 09:51:15 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0B753E84B for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 06:47:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id tz12so20677652ejc.9 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 06:47:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=kOPEVl8PMOwFRDDJfm+ptrMLsP3nfY1Nz8mblxqtLUE=; b=pCfDpHqPJWyRpPxWWsd5dK/6ivdLlC4j0DOVAMKqm/QaayY/IJRY0SvvHlZSsoZJf2 SzILCk+hSNN9wLDRLBgYabn49ah3JXvSp6uYQMLCMt7beBsXWQe7KHLvSCAfXMDkmlXA bf+03ICJqwn8uRGwHUEgDEPOLqXr5wLMiu8L/tTv/jsRkVtdiwr6+qrO/hxa8HzCwzrL yAmmUSikRjOyW4QNtJPvL+j79vhRWT2ZjgCPl4M83XCyP4GlrTFggxAlRuYSFgZ5ke2j 2yga7MHnTMI1MKdxCOIm4yDFmpwKyyaE0I1Fypxk0+g6aPPylpV92cCNik1wnUJg18lI eIWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kOPEVl8PMOwFRDDJfm+ptrMLsP3nfY1Nz8mblxqtLUE=; b=ZoaX7AIbeiI9eKKMznrSEJ6ZzJJfkwf8L9cMmILtHp+T/HtT9VkUT3gq2y+XFNMCyk 1h1HHTWglXHuAF2jsS6xNjTXktOhRQQYi2GbJvCvxxoYsqduUBDvHO3wgE2wamOfAQri CBnzyVNm7uKA2mEh+t53A+bBBHv63CErzPJKAmk0gIoz811B+srLhhkHRNiot0rAnx2C 61hPBmDxs51SeRLiW2vltywah3HYYYcRuO6VpPhnK1naq1aIPoFFDCzo4Vj1ywNxAcvu P94eCE3rCJS35rbKlPwna2TzfTMDttv914jHF3nCd3EWRLMbGzyJWgjbptj8VjmI0PPv YuYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kq0xIP6zcWSGSsturj0ootFM4RCP0kUrNpHPUm+23WWik/cVIx9 1PA1waUeYun5Rle7A+bgzhjDmlwZvnY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtvUWJr+ZZPGbVIiCMLrfgP1bRsSxdE/B5+US1Re47M37nNtVUaZ8pjf/woKmc7rlxZki6SKg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9d19:b0:7b9:f9d8:9554 with SMTP id kt25-20020a1709079d1900b007b9f9d89554mr3705810ejc.40.1673275658223; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 06:47:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from 127.0.0.1localhost (188.29.102.7.threembb.co.uk. [188.29.102.7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x11-20020a170906b08b00b0084c62b7b7d8sm3839578ejy.187.2023.01.09.06.47.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Jan 2023 06:47:37 -0800 (PST) From: Pavel Begunkov To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jens Axboe , asml.silence@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v3 09/11] io_uring: waitqueue-less cq waiting Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 14:46:11 +0000 Message-Id: <103d174d35d919d4cb0922d8a9c93a8f0c35f74a.1673274244.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org With DEFER_TASKRUN only ctx->submitter_task might be waiting for CQEs, we can use this to optimise io_cqring_wait(). Replace ->cq_wait waitqueue with waking the task directly. It works but misses an important optimisation covered by the following patch, so this patch without follow ups might hurt performance. Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov --- io_uring/io_uring.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c index 0dabd0f3271f..62d879b14873 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c @@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ static void io_req_local_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req) percpu_ref_put(&ctx->refs); return; } - /* need it for the following io_cqring_wake() */ + /* needed for the following wake up */ smp_mb__after_atomic(); if (unlikely(atomic_read(&req->task->io_uring->in_idle))) { @@ -1274,10 +1274,9 @@ static void io_req_local_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req) if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_TASKRUN_FLAG) atomic_or(IORING_SQ_TASKRUN, &ctx->rings->sq_flags); - if (ctx->has_evfd) io_eventfd_signal(ctx); - __io_cqring_wake(ctx); + wake_up_state(ctx->submitter_task, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); percpu_ref_put(&ctx->refs); } @@ -2578,12 +2577,17 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events, do { unsigned long check_cq; - prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&ctx->cq_wait, &iowq.wq, - TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN) { + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + } else { + prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&ctx->cq_wait, &iowq.wq, + TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + } + ret = io_cqring_wait_schedule(ctx, &iowq); + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); if (ret < 0) break; - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); /* * Run task_work after scheduling and before io_should_wake(). * If we got woken because of task_work being processed, run it @@ -2611,7 +2615,8 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events, cond_resched(); } while (1); - finish_wait(&ctx->cq_wait, &iowq.wq); + if (!(ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN)) + finish_wait(&ctx->cq_wait, &iowq.wq); restore_saved_sigmask_unless(ret == -EINTR); return READ_ONCE(rings->cq.head) == READ_ONCE(rings->cq.tail) ? ret : 0; -- 2.38.1