From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="nvi2wL0U" Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01FEF9B for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 20:45:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6ceccf6d88fso559712b3a.1 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 20:45:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1702356350; x=1702961150; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=YzW6ne78hOyVBwyJBdluG6G3urLMiolMojmNa+NoQdE=; b=nvi2wL0UDtdu/2NKSAK/bwR+VvCcNRx1At5zauChmbK+kRz9r7BfRsui0RevWbRXof vAkVpvFE5vEY4XrqHHJixGRTXb/wIeL4EAmx33BuL9yEtxkeilV4mAFsUWEThrQMyFgG dvIbU6wLaqzdfTjgT5tQvcyG/S7HfYY+sxnzFAyVQvmGhErcgj+WgUnrozW2ILcBflH2 ONJAtOHewDcP88+AAOfr+/bZ/A9KwKBDvOTQdTxiKouLzgexy0nyHJCS3QE6Daua/dQu cPEbioRPi1dTBx7rPxUVoqhxYuRwXDFXDZCUEqf6rgxKF7gqjs05DX+1yAXfrQsXbs92 cmSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1702356350; x=1702961150; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YzW6ne78hOyVBwyJBdluG6G3urLMiolMojmNa+NoQdE=; b=XCK08sIEEptu7taoie/b97gAaYnQ1w2JUEWtRRLbT0P4eXsbuCoRm0uS9Yy1qO6Rve Hzdf5RPGdcpBkmiIVkytnHkf3QmBI49eqOVSeLuqGOPyVamMgxSTbJSKSTL6BLm4E0SR ey2pu7Phk2YccZH3ylMSN1atExq0uDxYj3ePWLaPhsKe6/GO7n/rySY5nziUiwODjCVV cIvvyl7axWCnC1X+s6BmGLp82jl+vdFbmcLu0yS+ntNbHCz1O1GntyKNOlWzFPI4dSte 4CdAJzxj4PQVPObGJTlalTiwrrvMFJIcyTnV+gYhAoZEgI/P5kTSWGUmNN6teNcuxrUX iiuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw3bOv/eYIRZ0d7X0GSakDvLkNWgMZx2Bx92u5n7h5Hm9a3/6sk qE7wItEu8M7FEDITJZWcCXK3ZA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFeVarIjV/fmLCRlJK7v2wGXjcnIKXEDjNmlMbIoWER8XgjJrTP3GxTfPQuISj35Gsn/z0Skw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:4b4a:b0:6ce:720e:23e with SMTP id kr10-20020a056a004b4a00b006ce720e023emr11977411pfb.1.1702356350458; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 20:45:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpclient.apple ([198.8.77.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l2-20020a6542c2000000b005c621e0de25sm6176085pgp.71.2023.12.11.20.45.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Dec 2023 20:45:48 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Jens Axboe Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] io_uring/af_unix: disable sending io_uring over sockets Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 21:45:38 -0700 Message-Id: <105F23B4-F0B6-41E3-A795-F1B8E754A160@kernel.dk> References: <20231211183953.58c80c5c@kernel.org> Cc: Pavel Begunkov , patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, jannh@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20231211183953.58c80c5c@kernel.org> To: Jakub Kicinski X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21B101) On Dec 11, 2023, at 7:39=E2=80=AFPM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:= >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn Sun, 10 Dec 2023 01:18:00 +0000 Pavel Begunkov wrote: >>> Here is the summary with links: >>> - [RESEND] io_uring/af_unix: disable sending io_uring over sockets >>> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/69db702c8387 =20 >>=20 >> It has already been taken by Jens into the io_uring tree, and a pr >> with it was merged by Linus. I think it should be dropped from >> the net tree? >=20 > Ugh, I think if I revert it now it can only hurt. > Git will figure out that the change is identical, and won't complain > at the merge (unless we change it again on top, IIUC). Yeah, git will handle it just fine, it=E2=80=99ll just be an empty duplicate= . Annoying, but not the end of the world.=20 > If I may, however, in the most polite way possible put forward > the suggestion to send a notification to the list when patch is > applied, it helps avoid such confusion... I do hate most automated > emails myself, but an "applied" notification is good. I did do that, I always do. But looks like b4 replies to the first email rat= her than the one that had netdev cc=E2=80=99ed, which may be why this happen= ed in the first place.=20 =E2=80=94=20 Jens Axboe