From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] add persistent submission state
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 19:10:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 1/31/20 5:31 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 01/02/2020 01:32, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 01/02/2020 01:22, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 1/31/20 3:15 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>> Apart from unrelated first patch, this persues two goals:
>>>>
>>>> 1. start preparing io_uring to move resources handling into
>>>> opcode specific functions
>>>>
>>>> 2. make the first step towards long-standing optimisation ideas
>>>>
>>>> Basically, it makes struct io_submit_state embedded into ctx, so
>>>> easily accessible and persistent, and then plays a bit around that.
>>>
>>> Do you have any perf/latency numbers for this? Just curious if we
>>> see any improvements on that front, cross submit persistence of
>>> alloc caches should be a nice sync win, for example, or even
>>> for peak iops by not having to replenish the pool for each batch.
>>>
>>> I can try and run some here too.
>>>
>>
>> I tested the first version, but my drive is too slow, so it was only nops and
>> hence no offloading. Honestly, there waren't statistically significant results.
>> I'll rerun anyway.
>>
>> I have a plan to reuse it for a tricky optimisation, but thinking twice, I can
>> just stash it until everything is done. That's not the first thing in TODO and
>> will take a while.
>>
>
> I've got numbers, but there is nothing really interesting. Throughput is
> insignificantly better with the patches, but I'd need much more experiments
> across reboots to confirm that.
>
> Let's postpone the patchset for later
Sounds fine to me, no need to do it unless it's a nice cleanup, and/or
provides some nice improvements.
It would be great to see the splice stuff revamped, though :-)
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-01 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-31 22:15 [PATCH v3 0/6] add persistent submission state Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-31 22:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] io_uring: always pass non-null io_submit_state Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-31 22:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] io_uring: place io_submit_state into ctx Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-31 22:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] io_uring: move ring_fd into io_submit_state Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-31 22:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] io_uring: move *link " Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-31 22:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] io_uring: persistent req bulk allocation cache Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-31 22:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] io_uring: optimise " Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-31 22:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] add persistent submission state Jens Axboe
2020-01-31 22:32 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-01 0:31 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-01 2:10 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-02-01 11:42 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox