From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] io_uring: fix io_fail_links() locking
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:38:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a306de0c1e191b12bb4183b26f4df3e66b2a770c.1593519186.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
On 6/30/20 6:20 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> 86b71d0daee05 ("io_uring: deduplicate freeing linked timeouts")
> actually fixed one bug, where io_fail_links() doesn't consider
> REQ_F_COMP_LOCKED, but added another -- io_cqring_fill_event()
> without any locking
>
> Return locking back there and do it right with REQ_F_COMP_LOCKED
> check.
Something like the below is much better, and it also makes it so that
the static analyzers don't throw a fit. I'm going to fold this into
the original.
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index e1410ff31892..a0aea78162a6 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1600,7 +1600,7 @@ static void io_req_link_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxtptr)
/*
* Called if REQ_F_LINK_HEAD is set, and we fail the head request
*/
-static void io_fail_links(struct io_kiocb *req)
+static void __io_fail_links(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
@@ -1620,6 +1620,23 @@ static void io_fail_links(struct io_kiocb *req)
io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
}
+static void io_fail_links(struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
+ struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
+
+ if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_COMP_LOCKED)) {
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
+ __io_fail_links(req);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
+ } else {
+ __io_fail_links(req);
+ }
+
+ io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
+}
+
static void io_req_find_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt)
{
if (likely(!(req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_HEAD)))
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-30 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-30 12:20 [PATCH 0/8] iopoll and task_work fixes Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-30 12:20 ` [PATCH 1/8] io_uring: fix io_fail_links() locking Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-30 14:38 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-06-30 14:45 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-30 12:20 ` [PATCH 2/8] io_uring: fix commit_cqring() locking in iopoll Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-30 14:04 ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-30 14:36 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-30 14:46 ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-30 15:00 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-30 15:33 ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-30 12:20 ` [PATCH 3/8] io_uring: fix ignoring eventfd " Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-30 12:20 ` [PATCH 4/8] io_uring: fix missing ->mm on exit Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-30 12:20 ` [PATCH 5/8] io_uring: don't fail iopoll requeue without ->mm Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-30 12:20 ` [PATCH 6/8] io_uring: fix NULL mm in io_poll_task_func() Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-30 12:20 ` [PATCH 7/8] io_uring: simplify io_async_task_func() Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-30 12:20 ` [PATCH 8/8] io_uring: optimise io_req_find_next() fast check Pavel Begunkov
2020-06-30 12:39 ` [PATCH 0/8] iopoll and task_work fixes Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox