From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: pick up link work on submit reference drop
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:33:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2209 bytes --]
On 26/02/2020 01:18, Jens Axboe wrote:
> So this found something funky, we really should only be picking up
> the next request if we're dropping the final reference to the
> request. And io_put_req_find_next() also says that in the comment,
> but it always looks it up. That doesn't seem safe at all, I think
> this is what it should be:
It was weird indeed, it looks good. And now it's safe to do the same in
io_wq_submit_work().
Interestingly, this means that passing @nxt into the handlers is useless, as
they won't ever return !=NULL, isn't it? I'll prepare the cleanup.
>
> commit eff5fe974f332c1b86c9bb274627e88b4ecbbc85
> Author: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue Feb 25 13:25:41 2020 -0700
>
> io_uring: pick up link work on submit reference drop
>
> If work completes inline, then we should pick up a dependent link item
> in __io_queue_sqe() as well. If we don't do so, we're forced to go async
> with that item, which is suboptimal.
>
> This also fixes an issue with io_put_req_find_next(), which always looks
> up the next work item. That should only be done if we're dropping the
> last reference to the request, to prevent multiple lookups of the same
> work item.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index ffd9bfa84d86..f79ca494bb56 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -1483,10 +1483,10 @@ static void io_free_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
> __attribute__((nonnull))
> static void io_put_req_find_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxtptr)
> {
> - io_req_find_next(req, nxtptr);
> -
> - if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->refs))
> + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->refs)) {
> + io_req_find_next(req, nxtptr);
> __io_free_req(req);
> + }
> }
>
> static void io_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
> @@ -4749,7 +4749,7 @@ static void __io_queue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
>
> err:
> /* drop submission reference */
> - io_put_req(req);
> + io_put_req_find_next(req, &nxt);
>
> if (linked_timeout) {
> if (!ret)
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-26 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-25 20:27 [PATCH] io_uring: pick up link work on submit reference drop Jens Axboe
2020-02-25 21:22 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-25 21:25 ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-25 21:41 ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-25 22:18 ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-26 8:33 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2020-02-26 9:46 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-26 14:04 ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-25 21:45 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-25 21:52 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-25 22:24 ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-26 6:32 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox