From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 03/13] io_uring: refactor io_iopoll_req_issued
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 02:36:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1513bfde4f0c835be25ac69a82737ab0668d7665.1623634181.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
A simple refactoring of io_iopoll_req_issued(), move in_async inside so
we don't pass it around and save on double checking it.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 485f1f055db3..8fbb48c1ac7a 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -2520,9 +2520,14 @@ static void io_complete_rw_iopoll(struct kiocb *kiocb, long res, long res2)
* find it from a io_do_iopoll() thread before the issuer is done
* accessing the kiocb cookie.
*/
-static void io_iopoll_req_issued(struct io_kiocb *req, bool in_async)
+static void io_iopoll_req_issued(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
+ const bool in_async = io_wq_current_is_worker();
+
+ /* workqueue context doesn't hold uring_lock, grab it now */
+ if (unlikely(in_async))
+ mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
/*
* Track whether we have multiple files in our lists. This will impact
@@ -2549,14 +2554,19 @@ static void io_iopoll_req_issued(struct io_kiocb *req, bool in_async)
else
list_add_tail(&req->inflight_entry, &ctx->iopoll_list);
- /*
- * If IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL is enabled, sqes are either handled in sq thread
- * task context or in io worker task context. If current task context is
- * sq thread, we don't need to check whether should wake up sq thread.
- */
- if (in_async && (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) &&
- wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->sq_data->wait))
- wake_up(&ctx->sq_data->wait);
+ if (unlikely(in_async)) {
+ /*
+ * If IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL is enabled, sqes are either handle
+ * in sq thread task context or in io worker task context. If
+ * current task context is sq thread, we don't need to check
+ * whether should wake up sq thread.
+ */
+ if ((ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) &&
+ wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->sq_data->wait))
+ wake_up(&ctx->sq_data->wait);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ }
}
static inline void io_state_file_put(struct io_submit_state *state)
@@ -6210,23 +6220,11 @@ static int io_issue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
if (creds)
revert_creds(creds);
-
if (ret)
return ret;
-
/* If the op doesn't have a file, we're not polling for it */
- if ((ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL) && req->file) {
- const bool in_async = io_wq_current_is_worker();
-
- /* workqueue context doesn't hold uring_lock, grab it now */
- if (in_async)
- mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
-
- io_iopoll_req_issued(req, in_async);
-
- if (in_async)
- mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
- }
+ if ((ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL) && req->file)
+ io_iopoll_req_issued(req);
return 0;
}
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-14 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-14 1:36 [PATCH v2 for-next 00/13] resend of for-next cleanups Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 1:36 ` [PATCH 01/13] io-wq: embed wqe ptr array into struct io_wq Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 1:36 ` [PATCH 02/13] io-wq: remove unused io-wq refcounting Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 1:36 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-06-14 1:36 ` [PATCH 04/13] io_uring: rename function *task_file Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 1:36 ` [PATCH 05/13] io-wq: don't repeat IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT check by worker Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 1:36 ` [PATCH 06/13] io-wq: simplify worker exiting Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 1:36 ` [PATCH 07/13] io_uring: hide rsrc tag copy into generic helpers Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 1:36 ` [PATCH 08/13] io_uring: remove rsrc put work irq save/restore Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 1:36 ` [PATCH 09/13] io_uring: add helpers for 2 level table alloc Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 1:36 ` [PATCH 10/13] io_uring: don't vmalloc rsrc tags Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 1:36 ` [PATCH 11/13] io_uring: cache task struct refs Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 1:36 ` [PATCH 12/13] io_uring: unify SQPOLL and user task cancellations Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 1:36 ` [PATCH 13/13] io_uring: inline io_iter_do_read() Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 00/13] resend of for-next cleanups Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-05-24 23:50 [PATCH for-next 00/13] 5.14 batch 2 Pavel Begunkov
2021-05-24 23:51 ` [PATCH 03/13] io_uring: refactor io_iopoll_req_issued Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1513bfde4f0c835be25ac69a82737ab0668d7665.1623634181.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox