From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
Kernel Hardening <[email protected]>,
Kees Cook <[email protected]>, Aleksa Sarai <[email protected]>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>,
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
Sargun Dhillon <[email protected]>, Jann Horn <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
Jeff Moyer <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 2/3] io_uring: add IOURING_REGISTER_RESTRICTIONS opcode
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:11:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200721104009.lg626hmls5y6ihdr@steredhat>
On 7/21/20 4:40 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 03:26:51PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 7/16/20 6:48 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
>>> index efc50bd0af34..0774d5382c65 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
>>> @@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ enum {
>>> IORING_REGISTER_PROBE,
>>> IORING_REGISTER_PERSONALITY,
>>> IORING_UNREGISTER_PERSONALITY,
>>> + IORING_REGISTER_RESTRICTIONS,
>>>
>>> /* this goes last */
>>> IORING_REGISTER_LAST
>>> @@ -293,4 +294,30 @@ struct io_uring_probe {
>>> struct io_uring_probe_op ops[0];
>>> };
>>>
>>> +struct io_uring_restriction {
>>> + __u16 opcode;
>>> + union {
>>> + __u8 register_op; /* IORING_RESTRICTION_REGISTER_OP */
>>> + __u8 sqe_op; /* IORING_RESTRICTION_SQE_OP */
>>> + };
>>> + __u8 resv;
>>> + __u32 resv2[3];
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * io_uring_restriction->opcode values
>>> + */
>>> +enum {
>>> + /* Allow an io_uring_register(2) opcode */
>>> + IORING_RESTRICTION_REGISTER_OP,
>>> +
>>> + /* Allow an sqe opcode */
>>> + IORING_RESTRICTION_SQE_OP,
>>> +
>>> + /* Only allow fixed files */
>>> + IORING_RESTRICTION_FIXED_FILES_ONLY,
>>> +
>>> + IORING_RESTRICTION_LAST
>>> +};
>>> +
>>
>> Not sure I totally love this API. Maybe it'd be cleaner to have separate
>> ops for this, instead of muxing it like this. One for registering op
>> code restrictions, and one for disallowing other parts (like fixed
>> files, etc).
>>
>> I think that would look a lot cleaner than the above.
>>
>
> Talking with Stefan, an alternative, maybe more near to your suggestion,
> would be to remove the 'struct io_uring_restriction' and add the
> following register ops:
>
> /* Allow an sqe opcode */
> IORING_REGISTER_RESTRICTION_SQE_OP
>
> /* Allow an io_uring_register(2) opcode */
> IORING_REGISTER_RESTRICTION_REG_OP
>
> /* Register IORING_RESTRICTION_* */
> IORING_REGISTER_RESTRICTION_OP
>
>
> enum {
> /* Only allow fixed files */
> IORING_RESTRICTION_FIXED_FILES_ONLY,
>
> IORING_RESTRICTION_LAST
> }
>
>
> We can also enable restriction only when the rings started, to avoid to
> register IORING_REGISTER_ENABLE_RINGS opcode. Once rings are started,
> the restrictions cannot be changed or disabled.
My concerns are largely:
1) An API that's straight forward to use
2) Something that'll work with future changes
The "allow these opcodes" is straightforward, and ditto for the register
opcodes. The fixed file I guess is the odd one out. So if we need to
disallow things in the future, we'll need to add a new restriction
sub-op. Should this perhaps be "these flags must be set", and that could
easily be augmented with "these flags must not be set"?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-21 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-16 12:48 [PATCH RFC v2 0/3] io_uring: add restrictions to support untrusted applications and guests Stefano Garzarella
2020-07-16 12:48 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/3] io_uring: use an enumeration for io_uring_register(2) opcodes Stefano Garzarella
2020-07-16 20:16 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-16 20:42 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-16 20:47 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-16 20:51 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-16 21:20 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-17 8:13 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-07-16 12:48 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/3] io_uring: add IOURING_REGISTER_RESTRICTIONS opcode Stefano Garzarella
2020-07-16 21:26 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-17 8:55 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-07-21 10:40 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-07-21 17:11 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-07-22 2:35 ` Daurnimator
2020-07-22 14:14 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-07-22 14:29 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-07-16 12:48 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/3] io_uring: allow disabling rings during the creation Stefano Garzarella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox