From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH RFC] io_uring: support ioctl
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:44:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
Async ioctl is necessary for some scenarios like nonblocking
single-threaded model
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
---
I've written corresponding liburing tests for this feature. Currently
just a simple test for BLKGETSIZE operation. I'll release it later soon
when it gets better.
fs/io_uring.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/ioctl.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/fs.h | 3 ++-
include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index b42dfa0243bf..c8ab6b6d2d70 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -539,6 +539,13 @@ struct io_statx {
struct statx __user *buffer;
};
+struct io_ioctl {
+ struct file *file;
+ unsigned int fd;
+ unsigned int cmd;
+ unsigned long arg;
+};
+
struct io_completion {
struct file *file;
struct list_head list;
@@ -665,6 +672,7 @@ struct io_kiocb {
struct io_splice splice;
struct io_provide_buf pbuf;
struct io_statx statx;
+ struct io_ioctl ioctl;
/* use only after cleaning per-op data, see io_clean_op() */
struct io_completion compl;
};
@@ -932,6 +940,10 @@ struct io_op_def {
.hash_reg_file = 1,
.unbound_nonreg_file = 1,
},
+ [IORING_OP_IOCTL] = {
+ .needs_file = 1,
+ .work_flags = IO_WQ_WORK_MM | IO_WQ_WORK_FILES
+ },
};
enum io_mem_account {
@@ -4819,6 +4831,45 @@ static int io_connect(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NET */
+static int io_ioctl_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
+ const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
+{
+ if (sqe->ioprio || sqe->buf_index || sqe->rw_flags)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (unlikely(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ req->ioctl.fd = READ_ONCE(sqe->fd);
+ req->ioctl.cmd = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
+ req->ioctl.arg = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int io_ioctl(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ if (force_nonblock)
+ return -EAGAIN;
+
+ if (!req->file)
+ return -EBADF;
+
+ ret = security_file_ioctl(req->file, req->ioctl.cmd, req->ioctl.arg);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+
+ ret = do_vfs_ioctl(req->file, req->ioctl.fd, req->ioctl.cmd, req->ioctl.arg);
+ if (ret == -ENOIOCTLCMD)
+ ret = vfs_ioctl(req->file, req->ioctl.cmd, req->ioctl.arg);
+
+out:
+ if (ret)
+ req_set_fail_links(req);
+ io_req_complete(req, ret);
+ return 0;
+}
+
struct io_poll_table {
struct poll_table_struct pt;
struct io_kiocb *req;
@@ -5742,6 +5793,8 @@ static int io_req_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
return io_remove_buffers_prep(req, sqe);
case IORING_OP_TEE:
return io_tee_prep(req, sqe);
+ case IORING_OP_IOCTL:
+ return io_ioctl_prep(req, sqe);
}
printk_once(KERN_WARNING "io_uring: unhandled opcode %d\n",
@@ -5985,6 +6038,9 @@ static int io_issue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
case IORING_OP_TEE:
ret = io_tee(req, force_nonblock);
break;
+ case IORING_OP_IOCTL:
+ ret = io_ioctl(req, force_nonblock);
+ break;
default:
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
diff --git a/fs/ioctl.c b/fs/ioctl.c
index 4e6cc0a7d69c..4ff2eb0d8ee0 100644
--- a/fs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/ioctl.c
@@ -664,8 +664,8 @@ static int ioctl_file_dedupe_range(struct file *file,
* When you add any new common ioctls to the switches above and below,
* please ensure they have compatible arguments in compat mode.
*/
-static int do_vfs_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int fd,
- unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
+int do_vfs_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int fd,
+ unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
{
void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 0bd126418bb6..ad62aa6f6136 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1732,7 +1732,8 @@ int vfs_mkobj(struct dentry *, umode_t,
int vfs_utimes(const struct path *path, struct timespec64 *times);
extern long vfs_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg);
-
+extern int do_vfs_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int fd,
+ unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg);
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
extern long compat_ptr_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
index 98d8e06dea22..4919b4e94c12 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
@@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ enum {
IORING_OP_PROVIDE_BUFFERS,
IORING_OP_REMOVE_BUFFERS,
IORING_OP_TEE,
+ IORING_OP_IOCTL,
/* this goes last, obviously */
IORING_OP_LAST,
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-11-02 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-02 7:44 Hao Xu [this message]
2020-11-02 11:07 ` [PATCH RFC] io_uring: support ioctl Pavel Begunkov
2020-11-03 3:02 ` Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1604303041-184595-1-git-send-email-haoxu@linux.alibaba.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox