From: Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: fix shift-out-of-bounds when round up cq size
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:03:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
Abaci Fuzz reported a shift-out-of-bounds BUG in io_uring_create():
[ 59.598207] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in ./include/linux/log2.h:57:13
[ 59.599665] shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
[ 59.601230] CPU: 0 PID: 963 Comm: a.out Not tainted 5.10.0-rc4+ #3
[ 59.602502] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011
[ 59.603673] Call Trace:
[ 59.604286] dump_stack+0x107/0x163
[ 59.605237] ubsan_epilogue+0xb/0x5a
[ 59.606094] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds.cold+0xb2/0x20e
[ 59.607335] ? lock_downgrade+0x6c0/0x6c0
[ 59.608182] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xaf/0xe0
[ 59.609166] io_uring_create.cold+0x99/0x149
[ 59.610114] io_uring_setup+0xd6/0x140
[ 59.610975] ? io_uring_create+0x2510/0x2510
[ 59.611945] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x286/0x400
[ 59.613007] ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x27/0x80
[ 59.614038] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x5b/0x180
[ 59.615056] do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x40
[ 59.615940] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 59.617007] RIP: 0033:0x7f2bb8a0b239
This is caused by roundup_pow_of_two() if the input entries larger
enough, e.g. 2^32-1. For sq_entries, it will check first and we allow
at most IORING_MAX_ENTRIES, so it is okay. But for cq_entries, we do
round up first, that may overflow and truncate it to 0, which is not
the expected behavior. So check the cq size first and then do round up.
Fixes: 88ec3211e463 ("io_uring: round-up cq size before comparing with rounded sq size")
Reported-by: Abaci Fuzz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index a8c136a..f971589 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -9252,14 +9252,16 @@ static int io_uring_create(unsigned entries, struct io_uring_params *p,
* to a power-of-two, if it isn't already. We do NOT impose
* any cq vs sq ring sizing.
*/
- p->cq_entries = roundup_pow_of_two(p->cq_entries);
- if (p->cq_entries < p->sq_entries)
+ if (!p->cq_entries)
return -EINVAL;
if (p->cq_entries > IORING_MAX_CQ_ENTRIES) {
if (!(p->flags & IORING_SETUP_CLAMP))
return -EINVAL;
p->cq_entries = IORING_MAX_CQ_ENTRIES;
}
+ p->cq_entries = roundup_pow_of_two(p->cq_entries);
+ if (p->cq_entries < p->sq_entries)
+ return -EINVAL;
} else {
p->cq_entries = 2 * p->sq_entries;
}
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-11-24 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-24 7:03 Joseph Qi [this message]
2020-11-24 8:38 ` [PATCH] io_uring: fix shift-out-of-bounds when round up cq size Stefano Garzarella
2020-11-24 14:45 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1606201383-62294-1-git-send-email-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox