From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
Jeffle Xu <[email protected]>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]>,
Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected], Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v3 RESEND] iomap: set REQ_NOWAIT according to IOCB_NOWAIT in Direct IO
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 17:44:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
Currently, IOCB_NOWAIT is ignored in Direct IO, REQ_NOWAIT is only set
when IOCB_HIPRI is set. But REQ_NOWAIT should be set as well when
IOCB_NOWAIT is set.
Suggested-by: Jeffle Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
---
Hi all,
I tested fio io_uring direct read for a file on ext4 filesystem on a
nvme ssd. I found that IOCB_NOWAIT is ignored in iomap layer, which
means REQ_NOWAIT is not set in bio->bi_opf. This makes nowait IO a
normal IO. Since I'm new to iomap and block layer, I sincerely ask
yours opinions in case I misunderstand the code which is very likely
to happen.:)
The example I use: io_uring direct randread, the first try is with
IOCB_NOWAIT but not IOCB_HIPRI, the IOCB_NOWAIT is ignored in block
layer which I think is not the designed behaviour.
I found that Konstantin found this issue before in May
2020 (https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-block/msg53275.html), here add
his signature, add Jeffle's as well since he gave me some help.
v1->v2:
* add same logic in __blkdev_direct_IO_simple()
v2->v3:
* add same logic in do_blockdev_direct_IO()
fs/block_dev.c | 7 +++++++
fs/direct-io.c | 6 ++++--
fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 9e84b1928b94..ca6f365c2f14 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -263,6 +263,10 @@ static void blkdev_bio_end_io_simple(struct bio *bio)
bio.bi_opf = dio_bio_write_op(iocb);
task_io_account_write(ret);
}
+
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
+ bio.bi_opf |= REQ_NOWAIT;
+
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI)
bio_set_polled(&bio, iocb);
@@ -417,6 +421,9 @@ static void blkdev_bio_end_io(struct bio *bio)
task_io_account_write(bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
}
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
+ bio->bi_opf |= REQ_NOWAIT;
+
dio->size += bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
pos += bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
index d53fa92a1ab6..b221ed351c1c 100644
--- a/fs/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/direct-io.c
@@ -1206,11 +1206,13 @@ static inline int drop_refcount(struct dio *dio)
if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE) {
dio->op = REQ_OP_WRITE;
dio->op_flags = REQ_SYNC | REQ_IDLE;
- if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
- dio->op_flags |= REQ_NOWAIT;
} else {
dio->op = REQ_OP_READ;
}
+
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
+ dio->op_flags |= REQ_NOWAIT;
+
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI)
dio->op_flags |= REQ_HIPRI;
diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
index 933f234d5bec..2e897688ed6d 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
@@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ static void iomap_dio_submit_bio(struct iomap_dio *dio, struct iomap *iomap,
{
atomic_inc(&dio->ref);
+ if (dio->iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
+ bio->bi_opf |= REQ_NOWAIT;
+
if (dio->iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI)
bio_set_polled(bio, dio->iocb);
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-12-04 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-04 9:44 Hao Xu [this message]
2020-12-04 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND] iomap: set REQ_NOWAIT according to IOCB_NOWAIT in Direct IO Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-07 2:21 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-07 23:40 ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-09 21:15 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-10 2:33 ` JeffleXu
2020-12-08 5:46 ` JeffleXu
2020-12-09 21:23 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-10 1:55 ` JeffleXu
2020-12-10 5:18 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-11 2:50 ` JeffleXu
2020-12-14 2:56 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-15 9:43 ` JeffleXu
2021-04-02 14:32 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-02 16:26 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1607075096-94235-1-git-send-email-haoxu@linux.alibaba.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox