From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: account overflows even with IORING_SETUP_CQ_NODROP
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:51:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
It's useful for the application to know if the kernel had to dip into
using the backlog to prevent overflows. Let's keep on accounting any
overflow in cq_ring->overflow, even if we handled it correctly. As it's
impossible to get dropped events with IORING_SETUP_CQ_NODROP, overflow
with CQ_NODROP enabled simply provides a hint to the application that it
may reconsider using a bigger ring.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
Since this hasn't been released yet, we can tweak the behavior a bit. I
think it makes sense to still account the overflows, even if we handled
it correctly. If the application doesn't care, it simply doesn't need to
look at cq_ring->overflow if it is using CQ_NODROP. But it may care, as
it is less efficient than a suitably sized ring.
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 94ec44caac00..aa3b6149dfe9 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -666,10 +666,10 @@ static void io_cqring_overflow(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
long res)
__must_hold(&ctx->completion_lock)
{
- if (!(ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_CQ_NODROP)) {
- WRITE_ONCE(ctx->rings->cq_overflow,
- atomic_inc_return(&ctx->cached_cq_overflow));
- } else {
+ WRITE_ONCE(ctx->rings->cq_overflow,
+ atomic_inc_return(&ctx->cached_cq_overflow));
+
+ if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_CQ_NODROP) {
refcount_inc(&req->refs);
req->result = res;
list_add_tail(&req->list, &ctx->cq_overflow_list);
--
Jens Axboe
next reply other threads:[~2019-11-08 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-08 15:51 Jens Axboe [this message]
2019-11-09 9:59 ` [PATCH] io_uring: account overflows even with IORING_SETUP_CQ_NODROP Pavel Begunkov
2019-11-09 14:09 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox