* [PATCH 1/1] io_uring: fix io_queue_proc modifying req->flags
@ 2024-03-07 18:06 Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-07 18:48 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2024-03-07 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring; +Cc: Jens Axboe, asml.silence
With multiple poll entries __io_queue_proc() might be running in
parallel with poll handlers and possibly task_work, we should not be
carelessly modifying req->flags there. io_poll_double_prepare() handles
a similar case with locking but it's much easier to move it into
__io_arm_poll_handler().
Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: 595e52284d24a ("io_uring/poll: don't enable lazy wake for POLLEXCLUSIVE")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/poll.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/poll.c b/io_uring/poll.c
index 053d738c330c..5f779139cae1 100644
--- a/io_uring/poll.c
+++ b/io_uring/poll.c
@@ -540,14 +540,6 @@ static void __io_queue_proc(struct io_poll *poll, struct io_poll_table *pt,
poll->wait.private = (void *) wqe_private;
if (poll->events & EPOLLEXCLUSIVE) {
- /*
- * Exclusive waits may only wake a limited amount of entries
- * rather than all of them, this may interfere with lazy
- * wake if someone does wait(events > 1). Ensure we don't do
- * lazy wake for those, as we need to process each one as they
- * come in.
- */
- req->flags |= REQ_F_POLL_NO_LAZY;
add_wait_queue_exclusive(head, &poll->wait);
} else {
add_wait_queue(head, &poll->wait);
@@ -616,6 +608,17 @@ static int __io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req,
if (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED)
req->flags &= ~REQ_F_HASH_LOCKED;
+
+ /*
+ * Exclusive waits may only wake a limited amount of entries
+ * rather than all of them, this may interfere with lazy
+ * wake if someone does wait(events > 1). Ensure we don't do
+ * lazy wake for those, as we need to process each one as they
+ * come in.
+ */
+ if (poll->events & EPOLLEXCLUSIVE)
+ req->flags |= REQ_F_POLL_NO_LAZY;
+
mask = vfs_poll(req->file, &ipt->pt) & poll->events;
if (unlikely(ipt->error || !ipt->nr_entries)) {
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] io_uring: fix io_queue_proc modifying req->flags
2024-03-07 18:06 [PATCH 1/1] io_uring: fix io_queue_proc modifying req->flags Pavel Begunkov
@ 2024-03-07 18:48 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2024-03-07 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring, Pavel Begunkov
On Thu, 07 Mar 2024 18:06:32 +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> With multiple poll entries __io_queue_proc() might be running in
> parallel with poll handlers and possibly task_work, we should not be
> carelessly modifying req->flags there. io_poll_double_prepare() handles
> a similar case with locking but it's much easier to move it into
> __io_arm_poll_handler().
>
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] io_uring: fix io_queue_proc modifying req->flags
commit: 1a8ec63b2b6c91caec87d4e132b1f71b5df342be
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-07 18:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-07 18:06 [PATCH 1/1] io_uring: fix io_queue_proc modifying req->flags Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-07 18:48 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox