From: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <[email protected]>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>,
Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>,
Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>,
David Rientjes <[email protected]>,
Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]>,
Andrew Morton <[email protected]>,
Roman Gushchin <[email protected]>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <[email protected]>,
Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>,
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
Kees Cook <[email protected]>, Jann Horn <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: Fix too strict alignment check in create_cache()
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 10:54:39 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Fri, 22 Nov 2024, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> An aside, but note that there is a proposal to add nommu support to UML,
> which would entirely prevent our ability to eliminate it [0] (though it
> would make testing it easier! :)
Ok back to the alignment check. The patch is ok and an improvement since
it properly checks for the alignment of the scalar and does not assume
that a scalar is naturally aligned. That may not be necessary but it is
formally more correct.
So
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-22 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-20 12:46 [PATCH] slab: Fix too strict alignment check in create_cache() Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-20 12:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-20 15:00 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-20 15:01 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-20 15:03 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-11-20 15:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-20 15:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-11-20 15:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-20 17:50 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-11-21 3:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-11-21 8:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-21 17:23 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-11-21 18:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-21 18:35 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-21 18:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-21 19:08 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-21 19:22 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-22 9:45 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-22 12:55 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-22 18:54 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere) [this message]
2024-11-22 0:23 ` Greg Ungerer
2024-11-22 8:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-22 8:25 ` Max Filippov
2024-11-21 10:19 ` Christian Brauner
2024-11-21 22:02 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-11-22 2:12 ` Finn Thain
2024-11-22 7:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox