* [PATCH v2] io_uring/zcrx: return early from io_zcrx_recv_skb if readlen is 0
@ 2025-04-01 19:53 David Wei
2025-04-01 19:59 ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-01 20:01 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Wei @ 2025-04-01 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring; +Cc: Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov
When readlen is set for a recvzc request, tcp_read_sock() will call
io_zcrx_recv_skb() one final time with len == desc->count == 0. This is
caused by the !desc->count check happening too late. The offset + 1 !=
skb->len happens earlier and causes the while loop to continue.
Fix this in io_zcrx_recv_skb() instead of tcp_read_sock(). Return early
if len is 0 i.e. the read is done.
Changes in v2:
--------------
* Add Fixes tag
* Return 0 directly
* Add comment explaining why the !len check is needed
Fixes: 6699ec9a23f8 ("io_uring/zcrx: add a read limit to recvzc requests")
Signed-off-by: David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>
---
io_uring/zcrx.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/io_uring/zcrx.c b/io_uring/zcrx.c
index 9c95b5b6ec4e..2c8b29c745c5 100644
--- a/io_uring/zcrx.c
+++ b/io_uring/zcrx.c
@@ -818,6 +818,13 @@ io_zcrx_recv_skb(read_descriptor_t *desc, struct sk_buff *skb,
int ret = 0;
len = min_t(size_t, len, desc->count);
+ /* __tcp_read_sock() always calls io_zcrx_recv_skb one last time, even
+ * if desc->count is already 0. This is caused by the if (offset + 1 !=
+ * skb->len) check. Return early in this case to break out of
+ * __tcp_read_sock().
+ */
+ if (!len)
+ return 0;
if (unlikely(args->nr_skbs++ > IO_SKBS_PER_CALL_LIMIT))
return -EAGAIN;
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] io_uring/zcrx: return early from io_zcrx_recv_skb if readlen is 0
2025-04-01 19:53 [PATCH v2] io_uring/zcrx: return early from io_zcrx_recv_skb if readlen is 0 David Wei
@ 2025-04-01 19:59 ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-01 20:01 ` Jens Axboe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2025-04-01 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Wei, io-uring; +Cc: Pavel Begunkov
On 4/1/25 1:53 PM, David Wei wrote:
> When readlen is set for a recvzc request, tcp_read_sock() will call
> io_zcrx_recv_skb() one final time with len == desc->count == 0. This is
> caused by the !desc->count check happening too late. The offset + 1 !=
> skb->len happens earlier and causes the while loop to continue.
>
> Fix this in io_zcrx_recv_skb() instead of tcp_read_sock(). Return early
> if len is 0 i.e. the read is done.
>
> Changes in v2:
> --------------
> * Add Fixes tag
> * Return 0 directly
> * Add comment explaining why the !len check is needed
>
> Fixes: 6699ec9a23f8 ("io_uring/zcrx: add a read limit to recvzc requests")
> Signed-off-by: David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>
> ---
> io_uring/zcrx.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/io_uring/zcrx.c b/io_uring/zcrx.c
> index 9c95b5b6ec4e..2c8b29c745c5 100644
> --- a/io_uring/zcrx.c
> +++ b/io_uring/zcrx.c
> @@ -818,6 +818,13 @@ io_zcrx_recv_skb(read_descriptor_t *desc, struct sk_buff *skb,
> int ret = 0;
>
> len = min_t(size_t, len, desc->count);
> + /* __tcp_read_sock() always calls io_zcrx_recv_skb one last time, even
> + * if desc->count is already 0. This is caused by the if (offset + 1 !=
> + * skb->len) check. Return early in this case to break out of
> + * __tcp_read_sock().
> + */
> + if (!len)
> + return 0;
> if (unlikely(args->nr_skbs++ > IO_SKBS_PER_CALL_LIMIT))
> return -EAGAIN;
Bad comment format, but I can fix it up while applying. Thanks!
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] io_uring/zcrx: return early from io_zcrx_recv_skb if readlen is 0
2025-04-01 19:53 [PATCH v2] io_uring/zcrx: return early from io_zcrx_recv_skb if readlen is 0 David Wei
2025-04-01 19:59 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2025-04-01 20:01 ` Jens Axboe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2025-04-01 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring, David Wei; +Cc: Pavel Begunkov
On Tue, 01 Apr 2025 12:53:55 -0700, David Wei wrote:
> When readlen is set for a recvzc request, tcp_read_sock() will call
> io_zcrx_recv_skb() one final time with len == desc->count == 0. This is
> caused by the !desc->count check happening too late. The offset + 1 !=
> skb->len happens earlier and causes the while loop to continue.
>
> Fix this in io_zcrx_recv_skb() instead of tcp_read_sock(). Return early
> if len is 0 i.e. the read is done.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] io_uring/zcrx: return early from io_zcrx_recv_skb if readlen is 0
commit: fcfd94d6967a98e88b834c9fd81e73c5f04d83dc
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-01 20:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-01 19:53 [PATCH v2] io_uring/zcrx: return early from io_zcrx_recv_skb if readlen is 0 David Wei
2025-04-01 19:59 ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-01 20:01 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox