From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+a78926bdac2adb52dc0e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
axboe@kernel.dk, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
asml.silence@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: expect instance lock in netdev_queue_get_dma_dev()
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 23:20:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178640401364.250217.82789217556428963.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806225627.3998672-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2026 15:56:26 -0700 you wrote:
> netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() uses "compat" locking assert which wants
> either the rtnl_lock or netdev instance lock. This is not right,
> the callers are taking the instance lock unconditionally. All entry
> points for queue config are purely instance locked.
>
> In other words the callers use netdev_get_by_index_lock(), not
> netdev_get_by_index_lock_ops_compat(). All the state we will
> access is effectively instance lock protected (it's const for
> devices which are not ops-locked).
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] net: expect instance lock in netdev_queue_get_dma_dev()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/92465f46f3c3
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 22:56 [PATCH net] net: expect instance lock in netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-10 10:23 ` Simon Horman
2026-08-10 10:27 ` Daniel Borkmann
2026-08-10 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178640401364.250217.82789217556428963.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+a78926bdac2adb52dc0e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox