From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] io_uring/io-wq: let workers exit when unused
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 08:21:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17d76cc4-b186-4290-9eb4-412899c32880@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260202143755.789114-1-me@linux.beauty>
On 2/2/26 7:37 AM, Li Chen wrote:
> io_uring uses io-wq to offload regular file I/O. When that happens, the kernel
> creates per-task iou-wrk-<tgid> workers (PF_IO_WORKER) via create_io_thread(),
> so the worker is part of the process thread group and shows up under
> /proc/<pid>/task/.
>
> io-wq shrinks the pool on idle, but it intentionally keeps the last worker
> around indefinitely as a keepalive to avoid churn. Combined with io_uring's
> per-task context lifetime (tctx stays attached to the task until exit), a
> process may permanently retain an idle iou-wrk thread even after it has closed
> its last io_uring instance and has no active rings.
>
> The keepalive behavior is a reasonable default(I guess): workloads may have
> bursty I/O patterns, and always tearing down the last worker would add thread
> churn and latency. Creating io-wq workers goes through create_io_thread()
> (copy_process), which is not cheap to do repeatedly.
>
> However, CRIU currently doesn't cope well with such workers being part of the
> checkpointed thread group. The iou-wrk thread is a kernel-managed worker
> (PF_IO_WORKER) running io_wq_worker() on a kernel stack, rather than a normal
> userspace thread executing application code. In our setup, if the iou-wrk
> thread remains present after quiescing and closing the last io_uring instance,
> criu dump may hang while trying to stop and dump the thread group.
>
> Besides the resource overhead and surprising userspace-visible threads, this is
> a problem for checkpoint/restore. CRIU needs to freeze and dump all threads in
> the thread group. With a lingering iou-wrk thread, we observed criu dump can
> hang even after the ring has been quiesced and the io_uring fd closed, e.g.:
>
> criu dump -t $PID -D images -o dump.log -v4 --shell-job
> ps -T -p $PID -o pid,tid,comm | grep iou-wrk
>
> This series is a kernel-side enabler for checkpoint/restore in the current
> reality where userspace needs to quiesce and close io_uring rings before dump.
> It is not trying to make io_uring rings checkpointable, nor does it change what
> CRIU can or cannot restore (e.g. in-flight SQEs/CQEs, SQPOLL, SQE128/CQE32,
> registered resources). Even with userspace gaining limited io_uring support,
> this series only targets the specific "no active io_uring contexts left, but an
> idle iou-wrk keepalive thread remains" case.
>
> This series adds an explicit exit-on-idle mode to io-wq, and toggles it from
> io_uring task context when the task has no active io_uring contexts
> (xa_empty(&tctx->xa)). The mode is cleared on subsequent io_uring usage, so the
> default behavior for active io_uring users is unchanged.
>
> Tested on x86_64 with CRIU 4.2.
> With this series applied, after closing the ring iou-wrk exited within ~200ms
> and criu dump completed.
Applied with the mentioned commit message and IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT_ON_IDLE test
placement.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 14:37 [PATCH v1 0/2] io_uring/io-wq: let workers exit when unused Li Chen
2026-02-02 14:37 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] io-wq: add exit-on-idle mode Li Chen
2026-02-02 14:52 ` Jens Axboe
2026-02-02 15:14 ` Jens Axboe
2026-02-02 14:37 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] io_uring: allow io-wq workers to exit when unused Li Chen
2026-02-02 15:21 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17d76cc4-b186-4290-9eb4-412899c32880@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@linux.beauty \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox