public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH io_uring-7.1 v6 0/5] BPF controlled io_uring
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 11:29:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1985145e-7181-40c6-821d-239f62410618@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab4c6ffd-d7d2-45fc-bbd5-b6663d5c41e2@kernel.dk>

On 2/16/26 15:18, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/16/26 7:23 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 2/11/26 19:04, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> This series introduces a way to override the standard io_uring_enter
>>> syscall execution with an extendible event loop, which can be controlled
>>> by BPF via new io_uring struct_ops or from within the kernel.
>>
>> Let me know if there are any concerns or comments. There are some
>> parts that I'll need to add like timeouts for waiting, but those
>> will be natural extensions, and this feels like a good base to
>> move forward in general.
> 
> I don't have any complaints on it, but would be good to hear from the
> BPF folks.

I assumed Alexei has nothing against it in general since he didn't
mention, and his last review was quite straightforward, I just applied
all changes. But I'm not sure if he wants to take a another look.

I'll send out v8 to silence smatch, and let's see if BPF folks have
time for it.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-17 11:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-11 19:04 [PATCH io_uring-7.1 v6 0/5] BPF controlled io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2026-02-11 19:04 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] io_uring: introduce callback driven main loop Pavel Begunkov
2026-02-16 15:49   ` Jens Axboe
2026-02-11 19:04 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] io_uring/bpf-ops: implement loop_step with BPF struct_ops Pavel Begunkov
2026-02-11 19:04 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] io_uring/bpf-ops: add kfunc helpers Pavel Begunkov
2026-02-11 19:04 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] io_uring/bpf-ops: implement bpf ops registration Pavel Begunkov
2026-02-11 19:04 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] selftests/io_uring: add a bpf io_uring selftest Pavel Begunkov
2026-02-16 14:23 ` [PATCH io_uring-7.1 v6 0/5] BPF controlled io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2026-02-16 15:18   ` Jens Axboe
2026-02-17 11:29     ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2026-02-17 13:14       ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1985145e-7181-40c6-821d-239f62410618@gmail.com \
    --to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox