From: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty>
To: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "Pavel Begunkov" <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
"io-uring" <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] io_uring/io-wq: let workers exit when unused
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 08:37:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19c20ef1e4d.70da0b662392423.5502964729064267874@linux.beauty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17d76cc4-b186-4290-9eb4-412899c32880@kernel.dk>
Hi Jens,
---- On Mon, 02 Feb 2026 23:21:22 +0800 Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote ---
> On 2/2/26 7:37 AM, Li Chen wrote:
> > io_uring uses io-wq to offload regular file I/O. When that happens, the kernel
> > creates per-task iou-wrk-<tgid> workers (PF_IO_WORKER) via create_io_thread(),
> > so the worker is part of the process thread group and shows up under
> > /proc/<pid>/task/.
> >
> > io-wq shrinks the pool on idle, but it intentionally keeps the last worker
> > around indefinitely as a keepalive to avoid churn. Combined with io_uring's
> > per-task context lifetime (tctx stays attached to the task until exit), a
> > process may permanently retain an idle iou-wrk thread even after it has closed
> > its last io_uring instance and has no active rings.
> >
> > The keepalive behavior is a reasonable default(I guess): workloads may have
> > bursty I/O patterns, and always tearing down the last worker would add thread
> > churn and latency. Creating io-wq workers goes through create_io_thread()
> > (copy_process), which is not cheap to do repeatedly.
> >
> > However, CRIU currently doesn't cope well with such workers being part of the
> > checkpointed thread group. The iou-wrk thread is a kernel-managed worker
> > (PF_IO_WORKER) running io_wq_worker() on a kernel stack, rather than a normal
> > userspace thread executing application code. In our setup, if the iou-wrk
> > thread remains present after quiescing and closing the last io_uring instance,
> > criu dump may hang while trying to stop and dump the thread group.
> >
> > Besides the resource overhead and surprising userspace-visible threads, this is
> > a problem for checkpoint/restore. CRIU needs to freeze and dump all threads in
> > the thread group. With a lingering iou-wrk thread, we observed criu dump can
> > hang even after the ring has been quiesced and the io_uring fd closed, e.g.:
> >
> > criu dump -t $PID -D images -o dump.log -v4 --shell-job
> > ps -T -p $PID -o pid,tid,comm | grep iou-wrk
> >
> > This series is a kernel-side enabler for checkpoint/restore in the current
> > reality where userspace needs to quiesce and close io_uring rings before dump.
> > It is not trying to make io_uring rings checkpointable, nor does it change what
> > CRIU can or cannot restore (e.g. in-flight SQEs/CQEs, SQPOLL, SQE128/CQE32,
> > registered resources). Even with userspace gaining limited io_uring support,
> > this series only targets the specific "no active io_uring contexts left, but an
> > idle iou-wrk keepalive thread remains" case.
> >
> > This series adds an explicit exit-on-idle mode to io-wq, and toggles it from
> > io_uring task context when the task has no active io_uring contexts
> > (xa_empty(&tctx->xa)). The mode is cleared on subsequent io_uring usage, so the
> > default behavior for active io_uring users is unchanged.
> >
> > Tested on x86_64 with CRIU 4.2.
> > With this series applied, after closing the ring iou-wrk exited within ~200ms
> > and criu dump completed.
>
> Applied with the mentioned commit message and IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT_ON_IDLE test
> placement.
Thanks a lot for your review!
If you still want a test, I'm happy to write it. Since you've already
tweaked/applied the v1 series, I can send the test as a standalone
follow-up patch (no v2).
If kselftest is preferred, I'll base it on the same CRIU-style workload:
spawn iou-wrk-* via io_uring, quiesce/close the last ring, and check the
worker exits within a short timeout.
Regards,
Li
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-03 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 14:37 [PATCH v1 0/2] io_uring/io-wq: let workers exit when unused Li Chen
2026-02-02 14:37 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] io-wq: add exit-on-idle mode Li Chen
2026-02-02 14:52 ` Jens Axboe
2026-02-02 15:14 ` Jens Axboe
2026-02-02 14:37 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] io_uring: allow io-wq workers to exit when unused Li Chen
2026-02-02 15:21 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] io_uring/io-wq: let workers " Jens Axboe
2026-02-03 0:37 ` Li Chen [this message]
2026-02-03 2:29 ` Jens Axboe
2026-02-03 7:47 ` Li Chen
2026-02-03 14:09 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19c20ef1e4d.70da0b662392423.5502964729064267874@linux.beauty \
--to=me@linux.beauty \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox