From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59412C77B6F for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230200AbjDKPGx (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:06:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60482 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230222AbjDKPGv (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:06:51 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2E0E5276 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:06:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-75d1e0ff8ecso9366539f.0 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:06:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; t=1681225607; x=1683817607; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5OYepsyffP+bRFs4kNPAOND04VK6YGwmZGIYnadMN3s=; b=792+fXLP/FHebQi7o8brLl0/wf6r76sAIguiRhTgOJQQkkTZUSz2HXPDdehnQD2BML MKxNxOGQtl9Ov0M9/6nVS8ciEnwHF8Kwpf1ZxOKQf7IVL5JyVce7xSvCrH8e150s9xJl 7aK2TWgnIj2y8ALm5hHYWgCkY+wUH5PYOLMX31BjhIH+BhDYBI5SrMTO13lyBURH+KW1 8WQ3E2lE/y4aSrGllZyxOLENQBWX1nDBOtqqDrRvw7Vt7h1J3D9WCoX8K4VXFSsm4Zho tiDfoRsadNE+ikLKwxg4WKf66snOv3Whqzhju56oZJEofZoIOCDF7mtigLMU9gz2aIER 7M8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681225607; x=1683817607; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5OYepsyffP+bRFs4kNPAOND04VK6YGwmZGIYnadMN3s=; b=dABlmaCnTc9Q0KTEDRY4ogAJnPs+YeUsC+qTttsyxjM0kXM+Y4KAtI60VyDod1qjQa UNvk0o/I/vDOMixm0xU2OHr5haLv9nrGrAqziXNFyBFBlNauWMMHgWraMqJJjsz5UNiN zJRqwYk5K0hpFOQYHDBumyOH2B4aY6dZxne3DGvEcBrGjIE8IkF/HyLJP+O9dsaXRPra +9AThweBICUhulcIOq4/dsSLicAO4fCOXSsMBSAQjsjDFGYPa/1ROff0KXoPSY+Wjnbo I+StZ0025iCFWNVsmkMD74cda71jCWnYDXWWkQcVV0u1ysrndDbta++VCw8lZYEjmLkG d0Uw== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9cpHfXX+Uhna+jNRBETuaMxa0F365zrhlq3GNP/smQF0JUJBtWe hy96ph+HTxbgYq201eq3niNb9Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZAFK23oTWxlt6R1NG+aT0+Hmhpij+N+kVIqD6SwGBSCEX384WUI1EZYpyAD9/oH3B0BsXLcw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2d08:b0:758:9dcb:5d1a with SMTP id c8-20020a0566022d0800b007589dcb5d1amr6177264iow.2.1681225607059; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:06:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.94] ([96.43.243.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v8-20020a056602014800b007046e9e138esm3847948iot.22.2023.04.11.08.06.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:06:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19c69021-dce3-1a4a-00eb-920d1f404cfc@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:06:45 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] add initial io_uring_cmd support for sockets Content-Language: en-US To: Willem de Bruijn , David Ahern , Breno Leitao Cc: Willem de Bruijn , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, asml.silence@gmail.com, leit@fb.com, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, dccp@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matthieu.baerts@tessares.net, marcelo.leitner@gmail.com References: <20230406144330.1932798-1-leitao@debian.org> <75e3c434-eb8b-66e5-5768-ca0f906979a1@kernel.org> <67831406-8d2f-feff-f56b-d0f002a95d96@kernel.dk> <643573df81e20_11117c2942@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> <036c80e5-4844-5c84-304c-7e553fe17a9b@kernel.dk> <64357608c396d_113ebd294ba@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <64357608c396d_113ebd294ba@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 4/11/23 9:00?AM, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 4/11/23 8:51?AM, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >>> Jens Axboe wrote: >>>> On 4/11/23 8:36?AM, David Ahern wrote: >>>>> On 4/11/23 6:00 AM, Breno Leitao wrote: >>>>>> I am not sure if avoiding io_uring details in network code is possible. >>>>>> >>>>>> The "struct proto"->uring_cmd callback implementation (tcp_uring_cmd() >>>>>> in the TCP case) could be somewhere else, such as in the io_uring/ >>>>>> directory, but, I think it might be cleaner if these implementations are >>>>>> closer to function assignment (in the network subsystem). >>>>>> >>>>>> And this function (tcp_uring_cmd() for instance) is the one that I am >>>>>> planning to map io_uring CMDs to ioctls. Such as SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCINQ >>>>>> -> SIOCINQ. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please let me know if you have any other idea in mind. >>>>> >>>>> I am not convinced that this io_uring_cmd is needed. This is one >>>>> in-kernel subsystem calling into another, and there are APIs for that. >>>>> All of this set is ioctl based and as Willem noted a little refactoring >>>>> separates the get_user/put_user out so that in-kernel can call can be >>>>> made with existing ops. >>>> >>>> How do you want to wire it up then? We can't use fops->unlocked_ioctl() >>>> obviously, and we already have ->uring_cmd() for this purpose. >>> >>> Does this suggestion not work? >> >> Not sure I follow, what suggestion? >> > > This quote from earlier in the thread: > > I was thinking just having sock_uring_cmd call sock->ops->ioctl, like > sock_do_ioctl. But that doesn't work, because sock->ops->ioctl() assumes the arg is memory in userspace. Or do you mean change all of the sock->ops->ioctl() to pass in on-stack memory (or similar) and have it work with a kernel address? >>>> I do think the right thing to do is have a common helper that returns >>>> whatever value you want (or sets it), and split the ioctl parts into a >>>> wrapper around that that simply copies in/out as needed. Then >>>> ->uring_cmd() could call that, or you could some exported function that >>>> does supports that. >>>> >>>> This works for the basic cases, though I do suspect we'll want to go >>>> down the ->uring_cmd() at some point for more advanced cases or cases >>>> that cannot sanely be done in an ioctl fashion. >>> >>> Right now the two examples are ioctls that return an integer. Do you >>> already have other calls in mind? That would help estimate whether >>> ->uring_cmd() indeed will be needed and we might as well do it now. >> >> Right, it's a proof of concept. But we'd want to support anything that >> setsockopt/getsockopt would do. This is necessary so that direct >> descriptors (eg ones that describe a struct file that isn't in the >> process file table or have a regular fd) can be used for anything that a >> regular file can. Beyond that, perhaps various things necessary for >> efficient zero copy rx. >> >> I do think we can make the ->uring_cmd() hookup a bit more palatable in >> terms of API. It really should be just a sub-opcode and then arguments >> to support that. The grunt of the work is really refactoring the ioctl >> and set/getsockopt bits so that they can be called in-kernel rather than >> assuming copy in/out is needed. Once that is done, the actual uring_cmd >> hookup should be simple and trivial. > > That sounds like what I proposed above. That suggestion was only for > the narrow case where ioctls return an integer. The general approach > has to handle any put_user. Right > Though my initial skim of TCP, UDP and RAW did not bring up any other > forms. > > getsockopt indeed has plenty of examples, such as receive zerocopy. -- Jens Axboe