From: Dan Clash <[email protected]>
To: Paul Moore <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit,io_uring: io_uring openat triggers audit reference count underflow
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 16:06:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhQcSY9q=wVT7hOz9y=o3a67BVUnVGNotgAvE6vK7WAkBw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2023-10-13 11:43, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 10:21 AM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 10/13/23 2:24 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 02:55:18PM -0700, Dan Clash wrote:
>>>> An io_uring openat operation can update an audit reference count
>>>> from multiple threads resulting in the call trace below.
>>>>
>>>> A call to io_uring_submit() with a single openat op with a flag of
>>>> IOSQE_ASYNC results in the following reference count updates.
>>>>
>>>> These first part of the system call performs two increments that do not race.
>>>>
>>>> do_syscall_64()
>>>> __do_sys_io_uring_enter()
>>>> io_submit_sqes()
>>>> io_openat_prep()
>>>> __io_openat_prep()
>>>> getname()
>>>> getname_flags() /* update 1 (increment) */
>>>> __audit_getname() /* update 2 (increment) */
>>>>
>>>> The openat op is queued to an io_uring worker thread which starts the
>>>> opportunity for a race. The system call exit performs one decrement.
>>>>
>>>> do_syscall_64()
>>>> syscall_exit_to_user_mode()
>>>> syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare()
>>>> __audit_syscall_exit()
>>>> audit_reset_context()
>>>> putname() /* update 3 (decrement) */
>>>>
>>>> The io_uring worker thread performs one increment and two decrements.
>>>> These updates can race with the system call decrement.
>>>>
>>>> io_wqe_worker()
>>>> io_worker_handle_work()
>>>> io_wq_submit_work()
>>>> io_issue_sqe()
>>>> io_openat()
>>>> io_openat2()
>>>> do_filp_open()
>>>> path_openat()
>>>> __audit_inode() /* update 4 (increment) */
>>>> putname() /* update 5 (decrement) */
>>>> __audit_uring_exit()
>>>> audit_reset_context()
>>>> putname() /* update 6 (decrement) */
>>>>
>>>> The fix is to change the refcnt member of struct audit_names
>>>> from int to atomic_t.
>>>>
>>>> kernel BUG at fs/namei.c:262!
>>>> Call Trace:
>>>> ...
>>>> ? putname+0x68/0x70
>>>> audit_reset_context.part.0.constprop.0+0xe1/0x300
>>>> __audit_uring_exit+0xda/0x1c0
>>>> io_issue_sqe+0x1f3/0x450
>>>> ? lock_timer_base+0x3b/0xd0
>>>> io_wq_submit_work+0x8d/0x2b0
>>>> ? __try_to_del_timer_sync+0x67/0xa0
>>>> io_worker_handle_work+0x17c/0x2b0
>>>> io_wqe_worker+0x10a/0x350
>>>>
>>>> Cc: <[email protected]>
>>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/MW2PR2101MB1033FFF044A258F84AEAA584F1C9A@MW2PR2101MB1033.namprd21.prod.outlook.com/
>>>> Fixes: 5bd2182d58e9 ("audit,io_uring,io-wq: add some basic audit support to io_uring")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Clash <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/namei.c | 9 +++++----
>>>> include/linux/fs.h | 2 +-
>>>> kernel/auditsc.c | 8 ++++----
>>>> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
>>>> index 567ee547492b..94565bd7e73f 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/namei.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/namei.c
>>>> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ getname_flags(const char __user *filename, int flags, int *empty)
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - result->refcnt = 1;
>>>> + atomic_set(&result->refcnt, 1);
>>>> /* The empty path is special. */
>>>> if (unlikely(!len)) {
>>>> if (empty)
>>>> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ getname_kernel(const char * filename)
>>>> memcpy((char *)result->name, filename, len);
>>>> result->uptr = NULL;
>>>> result->aname = NULL;
>>>> - result->refcnt = 1;
>>>> + atomic_set(&result->refcnt, 1);
>>>> audit_getname(result);
>>>>
>>>> return result;
>>>> @@ -261,9 +261,10 @@ void putname(struct filename *name)
>>>> if (IS_ERR(name))
>>>> return;
>>>>
>>>> - BUG_ON(name->refcnt <= 0);
>>>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!atomic_read(&name->refcnt)))
>>>> + return;
>>>>
>>>> - if (--name->refcnt > 0)
>>>> + if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&name->refcnt))
>>>> return;
>>>
>>> Fine by me. I'd write this as:
>>>
>>> count = atomic_dec_if_positive(&name->refcnt);
>>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(unlikely(count < 0))
>>> return;
>>> if (count > 0)
>>> return;
>>
>> Would be fine too, my suspicion was that most archs don't implement a
>> primitive for that, and hence it might be more expensive than
>> atomic_read()/atomic_dec_and_test() which do. But I haven't looked at
>> the code generation. The dec_if_positive degenerates to a atomic cmpxchg
>> for most cases.
>
> I'm not too concerned, either approach works for me, the important bit
> is moving to an atomic_t/refcount_t so we can protect ourselves
> against the race. The patch looks good to me and I'd like to get this
> fix merged.
>
> Dan, barring any further back-and-forth on the putname() change, I
> would say to go ahead and make the change Christian suggested and
> repost the patch. Based on Jens comment above it seems safe to
> preserve his 'Reviewed-by:' tag on the next revision. Assuming there
> are no objections posted in the meantime, I'll plan to merge the next
> revision into the audit/stable-6.6 branch and get that up to Linus
> (likely next week since it's Friday).
I did not see many arch implementations of atomic_dec_if_positive.
The x86_64 generated code looks like arch_atomic_dec_unless_positive()
in atomic-arch-fallback.h with a loop around lock cmpxchg.
I did not want to compound the email race so I did not send patch v2 but
I can if desired.
devvm2 ~/linux $ sysctl kernel.arch
kernel.arch = x86_64
devvm2 ~/linux $ cat -n ./fs/namei.c | grep -B 7 -A 4 atomic_dec_if_positive
259 void putname(struct filename *name)
260 {
261 int count;
262
263 if (IS_ERR(name))
264 return;
265
266 count = atomic_dec_if_positive(&name->refcnt);
267 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(unlikely(count < 0)))
268 return;
269 if (count > 0)
270 return;
devvm2 ~/linux $ objdump --disassemble --line-numbers ./fs/namei.o | \
grep -B 8 -A 12 atomic_dec_if_positive
/home/daclash/linux/fs/namei.c:260
22e: 55 push %rbp
22f: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
232: 41 54 push %r12
arch_atomic_read():
/home/daclash/linux/./arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:23
234: 8b 47 10 mov 0x10(%rdi),%eax
237: 49 89 fc mov %rdi,%r12
raw_atomic_dec_if_positive():
/home/daclash/linux/./include/linux/atomic/atomic-arch-fallback.h:2535
23a: 89 c2 mov %eax,%edx
23c: 83 ea 01 sub $0x1,%edx
23f: 78 50 js 291 <putname+0x71>
arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg():
/home/daclash/linux/./arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:115
241: f0 41 0f b1 54 24 10 lock cmpxchg %edx,0x10(%r12)
248: 75 f0 jne 23a <putname+0x1a>
putname():
/home/daclash/linux/fs/namei.c:269
24a: 85 d2 test %edx,%edx
24c: 75 22 jne 270 <putname+0x50>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-13 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-12 21:55 [PATCH] audit,io_uring: io_uring openat triggers audit reference count underflow Dan Clash
2023-10-12 22:07 ` Jens Axboe
2023-10-13 8:24 ` Christian Brauner
2023-10-13 14:21 ` Jens Axboe
2023-10-13 15:43 ` Paul Moore
2023-10-13 20:06 ` Dan Clash [this message]
2023-10-13 15:44 ` Christian Brauner
2023-10-13 15:53 ` Jens Axboe
2023-10-13 16:03 ` Christian Brauner
2023-10-13 15:56 ` Paul Moore
2023-10-13 16:00 ` Jens Axboe
2023-10-13 16:05 ` Paul Moore
2023-10-13 16:22 ` Christian Brauner
2023-10-13 16:38 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19d3cb0b-e5ec-4a35-9ec5-06522903a80c@linux.microsoft.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox