* [PATCH 1/1] io-wq: remove io_wq_flush and IO_WQ_WORK_INTERNAL
@ 2020-03-02 20:46 Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-02 20:57 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2020-03-02 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, io-uring
io_wq_flush() is buggy, during cancellation an flush associated work may
be passed to user's (i.e. io_uring) @match callback, which doesn't a
work of a different layout. Neither sounds right cancellation of
internal work by io-wq users.
As it's not used anyway, delete it.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io-wq.c | 38 +-------------------------------------
fs/io-wq.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index f74a105ab968..042c7e2057ef 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static void io_worker_handle_work(struct io_worker *worker)
if (test_bit(IO_WQ_BIT_CANCEL, &wq->state))
work->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL;
- if (wq->get_work && !(work->flags & IO_WQ_WORK_INTERNAL)) {
+ if (wq->get_work) {
put_work = work;
wq->get_work(work);
}
@@ -1052,42 +1052,6 @@ enum io_wq_cancel io_wq_cancel_pid(struct io_wq *wq, pid_t pid)
return ret;
}
-struct io_wq_flush_data {
- struct io_wq_work work;
- struct completion done;
-};
-
-static void io_wq_flush_func(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
-{
- struct io_wq_work *work = *workptr;
- struct io_wq_flush_data *data;
-
- data = container_of(work, struct io_wq_flush_data, work);
- complete(&data->done);
-}
-
-/*
- * Doesn't wait for previously queued work to finish. When this completes,
- * it just means that previously queued work was started.
- */
-void io_wq_flush(struct io_wq *wq)
-{
- struct io_wq_flush_data data;
- int node;
-
- for_each_node(node) {
- struct io_wqe *wqe = wq->wqes[node];
-
- if (!node_online(node))
- continue;
- init_completion(&data.done);
- INIT_IO_WORK(&data.work, io_wq_flush_func);
- data.work.flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_INTERNAL;
- io_wqe_enqueue(wqe, &data.work);
- wait_for_completion(&data.done);
- }
-}
-
struct io_wq *io_wq_create(unsigned bounded, struct io_wq_data *data)
{
int ret = -ENOMEM, node;
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.h b/fs/io-wq.h
index 001194aef6ae..a0978d6958f0 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.h
+++ b/fs/io-wq.h
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ enum {
IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL = 1,
IO_WQ_WORK_HASHED = 4,
IO_WQ_WORK_UNBOUND = 32,
- IO_WQ_WORK_INTERNAL = 64,
IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL = 256,
IO_WQ_WORK_CONCURRENT = 512,
@@ -98,7 +97,6 @@ void io_wq_destroy(struct io_wq *wq);
void io_wq_enqueue(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wq_work *work);
void io_wq_enqueue_hashed(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wq_work *work, void *val);
-void io_wq_flush(struct io_wq *wq);
void io_wq_cancel_all(struct io_wq *wq);
enum io_wq_cancel io_wq_cancel_work(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wq_work *cwork);
--
2.24.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] io-wq: remove io_wq_flush and IO_WQ_WORK_INTERNAL
2020-03-02 20:46 [PATCH 1/1] io-wq: remove io_wq_flush and IO_WQ_WORK_INTERNAL Pavel Begunkov
@ 2020-03-02 20:57 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-03-02 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Begunkov, io-uring
On 3/2/20 1:46 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> io_wq_flush() is buggy, during cancellation an flush associated work may
> be passed to user's (i.e. io_uring) @match callback, which doesn't a
> work of a different layout. Neither sounds right cancellation of
> internal work by io-wq users.
>
> As it's not used anyway, delete it.
Thanks - and yes, it's unused now, so easy enough to just kill it
off. Applied for 5.6.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-02 20:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-02 20:46 [PATCH 1/1] io-wq: remove io_wq_flush and IO_WQ_WORK_INTERNAL Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-02 20:57 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox