public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] io_uring/net: clear msg_controllen on partial sendmsg retry
@ 2023-06-19 15:38 Jens Axboe
  2023-06-20  7:56 ` Stefan Metzmacher
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2023-06-19 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: io-uring; +Cc: Stefan Metzmacher

If we have cmsg attached AND we transferred partial data at least, clear
msg_controllen on retry so we don't attempt to send that again.

Cc: [email protected] # 5.10+
Fixes: cac9e4418f4c ("io_uring/net: save msghdr->msg_control for retries")
Reported-by: Stefan Metzmacher <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

---

diff --git a/io_uring/net.c b/io_uring/net.c
index 51b0f7fbb4f5..fe1c478c7dec 100644
--- a/io_uring/net.c
+++ b/io_uring/net.c
@@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 		if (ret == -EAGAIN && (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK))
 			return io_setup_async_msg(req, kmsg, issue_flags);
 		if (ret > 0 && io_net_retry(sock, flags)) {
+			kmsg->msg.msg_controllen = 0;
 			sr->done_io += ret;
 			req->flags |= REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO;
 			return io_setup_async_msg(req, kmsg, issue_flags);

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] io_uring/net: clear msg_controllen on partial sendmsg retry
  2023-06-19 15:38 [PATCH] io_uring/net: clear msg_controllen on partial sendmsg retry Jens Axboe
@ 2023-06-20  7:56 ` Stefan Metzmacher
  2023-06-20 13:06   ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Metzmacher @ 2023-06-20  7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring

Hi Jens,

> If we have cmsg attached AND we transferred partial data at least, clear
> msg_controllen on retry so we don't attempt to send that again.
> 
> Cc: [email protected] # 5.10+
> Fixes: cac9e4418f4c ("io_uring/net: save msghdr->msg_control for retries")
> Reported-by: Stefan Metzmacher <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/io_uring/net.c b/io_uring/net.c
> index 51b0f7fbb4f5..fe1c478c7dec 100644
> --- a/io_uring/net.c
> +++ b/io_uring/net.c
> @@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
>   		if (ret == -EAGAIN && (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK))
>   			return io_setup_async_msg(req, kmsg, issue_flags);
>   		if (ret > 0 && io_net_retry(sock, flags)) {
> +			kmsg->msg.msg_controllen = 0;
>   			sr->done_io += ret;
>   			req->flags |= REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO;
>   			return io_setup_async_msg(req, kmsg, issue_flags);
> 

Should we also set 'kmsg->msg.msg_control' to NULL?

metze

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] io_uring/net: clear msg_controllen on partial sendmsg retry
  2023-06-20  7:56 ` Stefan Metzmacher
@ 2023-06-20 13:06   ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2023-06-20 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Metzmacher, io-uring

On 6/20/23 1:56?AM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
>> If we have cmsg attached AND we transferred partial data at least, clear
>> msg_controllen on retry so we don't attempt to send that again.
>>
>> Cc: [email protected] # 5.10+
>> Fixes: cac9e4418f4c ("io_uring/net: save msghdr->msg_control for retries")
>> Reported-by: Stefan Metzmacher <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/io_uring/net.c b/io_uring/net.c
>> index 51b0f7fbb4f5..fe1c478c7dec 100644
>> --- a/io_uring/net.c
>> +++ b/io_uring/net.c
>> @@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
>>           if (ret == -EAGAIN && (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK))
>>               return io_setup_async_msg(req, kmsg, issue_flags);
>>           if (ret > 0 && io_net_retry(sock, flags)) {
>> +            kmsg->msg.msg_controllen = 0;
>>               sr->done_io += ret;
>>               req->flags |= REQ_F_PARTIAL_IO;
>>               return io_setup_async_msg(req, kmsg, issue_flags);
>>
> 
> Should we also set 'kmsg->msg.msg_control' to NULL?

We could, but I don't think it matters as we gate any checks on that
anyway. But in terms of completeness, may as well I suppose.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-20 13:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-19 15:38 [PATCH] io_uring/net: clear msg_controllen on partial sendmsg retry Jens Axboe
2023-06-20  7:56 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2023-06-20 13:06   ` Jens Axboe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox