public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [REPORT] Use-after-free Read in __fdget_raw in v5.10.y
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 10:23:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 5/18/22 09:39, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2022, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
>> On 5/18/22 9:14 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Wed, 18 May 2022, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/18/22 6:54 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>> On 5/18/22 6:52 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/18/22 6:50 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/17/22 7:00 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/17/22 6:36 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/17/22 6:24 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/17/22 5:41 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good afternoon Jens, Pavel, et al.,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure if you are presently aware, but there appears to be a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use-after-free issue affecting the io_uring worker driver (fs/io-wq.c)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Stable v5.10.y.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The full sysbot report can be seen below [0].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The C-reproducer has been placed below that [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had great success running this reproducer in an infinite loop.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My colleague reverse-bisected the fixing commit to:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   commit fb3a1f6c745ccd896afadf6e2d6f073e871d38ba
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Author: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Date:   Fri Feb 26 09:47:20 2021 -0700
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        io-wq: have manager wait for all workers to exit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        Instead of having to wait separately on workers and manager, just have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        the manager wait on the workers. We use an atomic_t for the reference
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        here, as we need to start at 0 and allow increment from that. Since the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        number of workers is naturally capped by the allowed nr of processes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        and that uses an int, there is no risk of overflow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     fs/io-wq.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this fix it:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit 886d0137f104a440d9dfa1d16efc1db06c9a2c02
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Author: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date:   Fri Mar 5 12:59:30 2021 -0700
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     io-wq: fix race in freeing 'wq' and worker access
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like it didn't make it into 5.10-stable, but we can certainly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rectify that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your quick response Jens.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This patch doesn't apply cleanly to v5.10.y.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is probably why it never made it into 5.10-stable :-/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Right.  It doesn't apply at all unfortunately.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll have a go at back-porting it.  Please bear with me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if you into issues with that and I can help out.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think the dependency list is too big.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Too much has changed that was never back-ported.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Actually the list of patches pertaining to fs/io-wq.c alone isn't so
>>>>>>>>>>> bad, I did start to back-port them all but some of the big ones have
>>>>>>>>>>> fs/io_uring.c changes incorporated and that list is huge (256 patches
>>>>>>>>>>> from v5.10 to the fixing patch mentioned above).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The problem is that 5.12 went to the new worker setup, and this patch
>>>>>>>>>> landed after that even though it also applies to the pre-native workers.
>>>>>>>>>> Hence the dependency chain isn't really as long as it seems, probably
>>>>>>>>>> just a few patches backporting the change references and completions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll take a look this afternoon.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks Jens.  I really appreciate it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you see if this helps? Untested...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What base does this apply against please?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I tried Mainline and v5.10.116 and both failed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's against 5.10.116, so that's puzzling. Let me double check I sent
>>>>>> the right one...
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like I sent the one from the wrong directory, sorry about that.
>>>>> This one should be better:
>>>>
>>>> Nope, both are the right one. Maybe your mailer is mangling the patch?
>>>> I'll attach it gzip'ed here in case that helps.
>>>
>>> Okay, that applied, thanks.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I am still able to crash the kernel in the same way.
>>
>> Alright, maybe it's not enough. I can't get your reproducer to crash,
>> unfortunately. I'll try on a different box.
> 
> You need to have fuzzing and kasan enabled.

I do have kasan enabled. What's fuzzing?

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-18 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-17 11:41 [REPORT] Use-after-free Read in __fdget_raw in v5.10.y Lee Jones
2022-05-17 11:59 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-17 12:24   ` Lee Jones
2022-05-17 12:25     ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-17 12:36       ` Lee Jones
2022-05-17 12:47         ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-17 13:00           ` Lee Jones
2022-05-17 23:52             ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-18 12:50               ` Lee Jones
2022-05-18 12:52                 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-18 12:54                   ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-18 12:56                     ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-18 15:14                       ` Lee Jones
2022-05-18 15:20                         ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-18 15:39                           ` Lee Jones
2022-05-18 16:23                             ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-05-18 16:34                               ` Lee Jones
2022-05-18 17:42                                 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-19  9:26                                   ` Lee Jones
2022-05-19 12:13                                     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox