From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] io_uring: don't do full *prep_worker() from io-wq
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:48:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1157 bytes --]
On 24/02/2020 18:30, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/24/20 1:30 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> io_prep_async_worker() called io_wq_assign_next() do many useless checks:
>> io_req_work_grab_env() was already called during prep, and @do_hashed
>> is not ever used. Add io_prep_next_work() -- simplified version, that
>> can be called io-wq.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> fs/io_uring.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>> index 819661f49023..3003e767ced3 100644
>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>> @@ -955,6 +955,17 @@ static inline void io_req_work_drop_env(struct io_kiocb *req)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static inline void io_prep_next_work(struct io_kiocb *req,
>> + struct io_kiocb **link)
>> +{
>> + const struct io_op_def *def = &io_op_defs[req->opcode];
>> +
>> + if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_ISREG) && def->unbound_nonreg_file)
>> + req->work.flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_UNBOUND;
>
> Extra tab?
Yep. Would resending [2/3] be enough?
> Otherwise looks fine.
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-24 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-24 8:30 [PATCH v3 0/3] async punting improvements for io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-24 8:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] io_uring: don't call work.func from sync ctx Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-24 8:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] io_uring: don't do full *prep_worker() from io-wq Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-24 15:30 ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-24 15:48 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2020-02-24 15:57 ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-24 15:57 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-24 8:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] io_uring: remove req->in_async Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-24 9:17 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] async punting improvements for io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-24 15:30 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox