From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: allow POLL_ADD with double poll_wait() users
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 23:22:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4714 bytes --]
On 10/02/2020 23:56, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Some file descriptors use separate waitqueues for their f_ops->poll()
> handler, most commonly one for read and one for write. The io_uring
> poll implementation doesn't work with that, as the 2nd poll_wait()
> call will cause the io_uring poll request to -EINVAL.
>
> This is particularly a problem now that pipes were switched to using
> multiple wait queues (commit 0ddad21d3e99), but it also affects tty
> devices and /dev/random as well. This is a big problem for event loops
> where some file descriptors work, and others don't.
>
> With this fix, io_uring handles multiple waitqueues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/io_uring.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 123e6424a050..72bc378edebc 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -3439,10 +3439,27 @@ static int io_connect(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt,
> #endif
> }
>
> +static void io_poll_remove_double(struct io_kiocb *req)
> +{
> + struct io_poll_iocb *poll = (struct io_poll_iocb *) req->io;
> +
> + if (poll && poll->head) {
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&poll->head->lock, flags);
> + list_del_init(&poll->wait.entry);
> + if (poll->wait.private)
> + refcount_dec(&req->refs);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&poll->head->lock, flags);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void io_poll_remove_one(struct io_kiocb *req)
> {
> struct io_poll_iocb *poll = &req->poll;
>
> + io_poll_remove_double(req);
> +
> spin_lock(&poll->head->lock);
> WRITE_ONCE(poll->canceled, true);
> if (!list_empty(&poll->wait.entry)) {
> @@ -3678,10 +3695,39 @@ static int io_poll_wake(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
> if (mask && !(mask & poll->events))
> return 0;
>
> + io_poll_remove_double(req);
> __io_poll_wake(req, &req->poll, mask);
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static int io_poll_double_wake(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode,
> + int sync, void *key)
> +{
> + struct io_kiocb *req = wait->private;
> + struct io_poll_iocb *poll = (void *) req->io;
> + __poll_t mask = key_to_poll(key);
> + bool done = true;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* for instances that support it check for an event match first: */
> + if (mask && !(mask & poll->events))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (req->poll.head) {
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&req->poll.head->lock, flags);
> + done = list_empty(&req->poll.wait.entry);
> + if (!done)
> + list_del_init(&req->poll.wait.entry);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&req->poll.head->lock, flags);
> + }
> + if (!done)
> + __io_poll_wake(req, poll, mask);
> + refcount_dec(&req->refs);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> struct io_poll_table {
> struct poll_table_struct pt;
> struct io_kiocb *req;
> @@ -3692,15 +3738,33 @@ static void io_poll_queue_proc(struct file *file, struct wait_queue_head *head,
> struct poll_table_struct *p)
> {
> struct io_poll_table *pt = container_of(p, struct io_poll_table, pt);
> + struct io_kiocb *req = pt->req;
> + struct io_poll_iocb *poll = &req->poll;
>
> - if (unlikely(pt->req->poll.head)) {
> - pt->error = -EINVAL;
> - return;
> + /*
> + * If poll->head is already set, it's because the file being polled
> + * use multiple waitqueues for poll handling (eg one for read, one
> + * for write). Setup a separate io_poll_iocb if this happens.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(poll->head)) {
I'll keep looking, but I guess there should be :
if (req->io)
return -EINVAL;
> + poll = kmalloc(sizeof(*poll), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (!poll) {
> + pt->error = -ENOMEM;
> + return;
> + }
> + poll->done = false;
> + poll->canceled = false;
> + poll->events = req->poll.events;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&poll->wait.entry);
> + init_waitqueue_func_entry(&poll->wait, io_poll_double_wake);
> + refcount_inc(&req->refs);
> + poll->wait.private = req;
> + req->io = (void *) poll;
> }
>
> pt->error = 0;
> - pt->req->poll.head = head;
> - add_wait_queue(head, &pt->req->poll.wait);
> + poll->head = head;
> + add_wait_queue(head, &poll->wait);
> }
>
> static void io_poll_req_insert(struct io_kiocb *req)
> @@ -3777,6 +3841,7 @@ static int io_poll_add(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt)
> }
> if (mask) { /* no async, we'd stolen it */
> ipt.error = 0;
> + io_poll_remove_double(req);
> io_poll_complete(req, mask, 0);
> }
> spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-11 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-10 20:56 [PATCHSET 0/3] io_uring: make POLL_ADD support multiple waitqs Jens Axboe
2020-02-10 20:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: store io_kiocb in wait->private Jens Axboe
2020-02-10 20:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: abstract out main poll wake handler Jens Axboe
2020-02-10 20:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: allow POLL_ADD with double poll_wait() users Jens Axboe
2020-02-11 20:22 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2020-02-11 20:27 ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCHSET 0/3] io_uring: make POLL_ADD support multiple waitqs Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-11 20:06 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-12 20:25 [PATCHSET v2 " Jens Axboe
2020-02-12 20:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: allow POLL_ADD with double poll_wait() users Jens Axboe
2020-02-13 15:50 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox