From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] io_uring: make io_double_put_req() use normal completion path
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 18:53:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
If we don't use the normal completion path, we may skip killing links
that should be errored and freed. Add __io_double_put_req() for use
within the completion path itself, other calls should just use
io_double_put_req().
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 56a9321a4232..3f4d6641bea2 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ static void io_cqring_fill_event(struct io_kiocb *req, long res);
static void __io_free_req(struct io_kiocb *req);
static void io_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req);
static void io_double_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req);
+static void __io_double_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req);
static struct kmem_cache *req_cachep;
@@ -911,7 +912,7 @@ static void io_fail_links(struct io_kiocb *req)
io_link_cancel_timeout(link);
} else {
io_cqring_fill_event(link, -ECANCELED);
- io_double_put_req(link);
+ __io_double_put_req(link);
}
}
@@ -985,13 +986,24 @@ static void io_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
io_free_req(req);
}
-static void io_double_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
+/*
+ * Must only be used if we don't need to care about links, usually from
+ * within the completion handling itself.
+ */
+static void __io_double_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
/* drop both submit and complete references */
if (refcount_sub_and_test(2, &req->refs))
__io_free_req(req);
}
+static void io_double_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
+ /* drop both submit and complete references */
+ if (refcount_sub_and_test(2, &req->refs))
+ io_free_req(req);
+}
+
static unsigned io_cqring_events(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool noflush)
{
struct io_rings *rings = ctx->rings;
--
2.24.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-16 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-16 1:53 [PATCHSET] Pending io_uring items not yet queued up for 5.5 Jens Axboe
2019-11-16 1:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] io-wq: remove now redundant struct io_wq_nulls_list Jens Axboe
2019-11-16 1:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] io_uring: make POLL_ADD/POLL_REMOVE scale better Jens Axboe
2019-11-16 1:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] io_uring: io_async_cancel() should pass in 'nxt' request pointer Jens Axboe
2019-11-16 1:53 ` [PATCH 4/8] io_uring: cleanup return values from the queueing functions Jens Axboe
2019-11-16 1:53 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2019-11-16 1:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] io_uring: make req->timeout be dynamically allocated Jens Axboe
2019-11-16 1:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] io_uring: fix sequencing issues with linked timeouts Jens Axboe
2019-11-19 20:51 ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-11-19 22:13 ` Jens Axboe
2019-11-20 12:42 ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-11-20 17:19 ` Jens Axboe
2019-11-20 18:15 ` Jens Axboe
2019-11-16 1:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] io_uring: remove dead REQ_F_SEQ_PREV flag Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox