[PATCH 1/2] io_uring: allow finding next link independent of req reference count

[Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>]

We currently try and start the next link when we put the request, and
only if we were going to free it. This means that the optimization to
continue executing requests from the same context often fails, as we're
not putting the final reference.

Add REQ_F_LINK_NEXT to keep track of this, and allow io_uring to find the
next request more efficiently.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 066b59ffb54e..132a890368bf 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -340,6 +340,7 @@ struct io_kiocb {
 #define REQ_F_NOWAIT		1	/* must not punt to workers */
 #define REQ_F_IOPOLL_COMPLETED	2	/* polled IO has completed */
 #define REQ_F_FIXED_FILE	4	/* ctx owns file */
+#define REQ_F_LINK_NEXT		8	/* already grabbed next link */
 #define REQ_F_IO_DRAIN		16	/* drain existing IO first */
 #define REQ_F_IO_DRAINED	32	/* drain done */
 #define REQ_F_LINK		64	/* linked sqes */
@@ -874,6 +875,10 @@ static void io_req_link_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxtptr)
 	struct io_kiocb *nxt;
 	bool wake_ev = false;
 
+	/* Already got next link */
+	if (req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_NEXT)
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * The list should never be empty when we are called here. But could
 	 * potentially happen if the chain is messed up, check to be on the
@@ -910,6 +915,7 @@ static void io_req_link_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxtptr)
 		break;
 	}
 
+	req->flags |= REQ_F_LINK_NEXT;
 	if (wake_ev)
 		io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
 }
@@ -946,12 +952,10 @@ static void io_fail_links(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
 }
 
-static void io_free_req_find_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt)
+static void io_req_find_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt)
 {
-	if (likely(!(req->flags & REQ_F_LINK))) {
-		__io_free_req(req);
+	if (likely(!(req->flags & REQ_F_LINK)))
 		return;
-	}
 
 	/*
 	 * If LINK is set, we have dependent requests in this chain. If we
@@ -977,7 +981,11 @@ static void io_free_req_find_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt)
 	} else {
 		io_req_link_next(req, nxt);
 	}
+}
 
+static void io_free_req_find_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt)
+{
+	io_req_find_next(req, nxt);
 	__io_free_req(req);
 }
 
@@ -994,8 +1002,10 @@ static void io_put_req_find_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxtptr)
 {
 	struct io_kiocb *nxt = NULL;
 
+	io_req_find_next(req, &nxt);
+
 	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->refs))
-		io_free_req_find_next(req, &nxt);
+		__io_free_req(req);
 
 	if (nxt) {
 		if (nxtptr)
-- 
2.24.0