From: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
To: Glauber Costa <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: shutdown not affecting connection?
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 10:48:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD-J=zaQ2hCBKYCgsK8ehhzF4WgB0=1uMgG=p1BQ1V1YsN37_A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On 2020-02-08 08:55:25 -0500, Glauber Costa wrote:
> - A connect() call is issued (and in the backend I can choose if I use
> uring or not)
> - The connection is supposed to take a while to establish.
> - I call shutdown on the file descriptor
>
> If io_uring is not used:
> - connect() starts by returning EINPROGRESS as expected, and after
> the shutdown the file descriptor is finally made ready for epoll. I
> call getsockopt(SOL_SOCKET, SO_ERROR), and see the error (104)
>
> if io_uring is used:
> - if the SQE has the IOSQE_ASYNC flag on, connect() never returns.
That should be easy enough to reproduce without seastar as it sounds
deterministic - how about modifying liburing's test/connect.c test to
behave this way?
Hm, any chance you set O_NONBLOCK on the fd, before calling the async
connect?
Wonder if io_connect()
file_flags = force_nonblock ? O_NONBLOCK : 0;
ret = __sys_connect_file(req->file, &io->connect.address,
req->connect.addr_len, file_flags);
if ((ret == -EAGAIN || ret == -EINPROGRESS) && force_nonblock) {
fully takes into account that __sys_connect_file
err = sock->ops->connect(sock, (struct sockaddr *)address, addrlen,
sock->file->f_flags | file_flags);
appears to leave O_NONBLOCK set on the file in place, which'd then
not block in the wq?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-08 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-08 13:55 shutdown not affecting connection? Glauber Costa
2020-02-08 14:26 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-08 18:42 ` Glauber Costa
2020-02-08 18:48 ` Avi Kivity
2020-02-08 18:57 ` Glauber Costa
2020-02-08 20:20 ` Glauber Costa
2020-02-08 20:28 ` Avi Kivity
2020-02-08 20:43 ` Glauber Costa
2020-02-08 18:48 ` Andres Freund [this message]
2020-02-08 18:54 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox